Meatbrain thinks the surge is not working, but we can pretty much dismiss his idiocy with a block of salt.
If it bleeds it ledes, which is what we’ve been complaining about since the beginning, even when there was no war. The MSM and others-hate to report good news, it’s just a fact. It’s as if good news out of Iraq doesn’t exist. But that’s the attitude of someone who’s a) never been to Iraq b) never read Iraq the Model and c) never heard an Iraqi talk about what this has all meant to future generations of Iraqis.
“If it bleeds, it ledes”
And as Dymphna put it here,
The opposite aphorism might be “if it’s important but no frenzied groups rampage, or no one dies or sets things on fire or slanders prominent politicians, bury it.”
FNC’s O’Reilly Highlights MRC Study: As Iraq Improves, Coverage Falls
U.S. casualties and violence are way down from six months ago. Then, citing the MRC’s numbers with a chart displaying them on screen, he observed how now “there is far less carnage in Iraq and far less reporting about the war. Since the surge began, Iraq war stories on the nightly news programs have dropped from 178 a month to 68 in November. Those stats were compiled by the conservative watchdog group Media Research Center and you can read the report online at mrc.org.” (Volume 12, from December 7th)
A December 4 CyberAlert Special provided the text of the study by MRC Research Director Rich Noyes.
The key finding:
….MRC researchers examined all 354 Iraq war stories that aired on the big three evening newscasts from September 1 through November 30, including weekends. That figure includes 234 field reports, plus 120 short headline items read by the news anchor.
Vanishing War. Back in September, as reporters voiced skepticism of General Petraeus’ progress report, the networks aired a total of 178 Iraq stories, or just under two per network per night. About one-fourth of those stories (42) were filed from Iraq itself, with most of the rest originating in Washington.
In October, TV’s war news fell by about 40 percent, to 108 stories, with the number of reports filed from Iraq itself falling to just 20, or less than one-fifth of all Iraq stories. By November, the networks aired a mere 68 stories, with only eleven (16%) actually from the war zone itself….
END of Excerpt
For the December 4 report in full, “Good News = Less News on Iraq War; MRC Study: As Surge Succeeds and Casualty Rates Fall, ABC, CBS and NBC Lose Interest In Iraq War,” go to: www.mediaresearch.org
For the PDF, which matches the hard copy: www.mediaresearch.org
Investor’s Business Daily on Thursday published an op-ed by Rich Noyes summarizing his findings. To read “Television Networks Fade to Black as the U.S. Surge Succeeds in Iraq,” go to: www.ibdeditorials.com
A transcript of O’Reilly’s “Talking Points Memo” at the top of the December 6 edition of The O’Reilly Factor on FNC:
O’REILLY: Getting the truth about Iraq. That is the subject of this evening’s Talking Points Memo. With things getting much better in Iraq, voters now must decide how big an issue this will be next year? Do you pull out of there if you’re winning? Naturally, when the USA was stalemated in that theater many people said enough, it’s not worth it, and the Republicans lost both the House and the Senate. But now the surge has improved security. American casualties are down a whopping 71 percent since May and al Qaeda in Iraq has been badly damaged. Again, do we pull out if there’s a chance Iraq can become a stable, anti-terror nation? Some will say yes, get out of there. But many, perhaps most, might take a second look, and that second look might be bad for the Democrats who generally oppose the war.
Enter the media. Last June I told you that some TV news organizations were showing carnage in Iraq with no context. If it blew up, it made the nightly news.
O’REILLY, JUNE 14: Now, as everyone knows al Qaeda strategy is to break the will of the American people to fight the jihad — Osama bin Laden has stated that in writing. So blowing things up, and hopefully getting the carnage on TV, is what the terrorists want.
O’REILLY, BACK ON THURSDAY NIGHT: Now I was criticized by people like Washington Post TV writer Howard Kurtz for saying that, but it was true. Carnage without context was the rule of the day and it helped the terrorists. Six months later, there is far less carnage in Iraq and far less reporting about the war. Since the surge began, Iraq war stories on the nightly news programs have dropped from 178 a month to 68 in November. Those stats were compiled by the conservative watchdog group Media Research Center and you can read the report online at mrc.org.
This is proof that bad news in Iraq is promoted by American news agencies while good news is largely ignored. But why? Talking Points believes that most of the American media despise President Bush and will ignore anything that puts him in a positive light. I could be wrong about that, but the evidence is overwhelming I’m not. Also, it is my opinion that most of the media wants a Democrat elected next time around and any good news from Iraq might not advance that cause. There is no question that Iraq remains a troubling issue — the government there is inefficient and corruption is everywhere. If we could go back in a time machine and do it again, I firmly believe we could have found a better way to remove Saddam Hussein. But honesty in reporting is vital to a free society and we’re not getting that in America. We’re seeing a partisan press promoting ideology, not fairly covering the news. That is the truth and the proof is the current reporting on Iraq.
– Brent Baker
—————————————————
We see things in the news mainly when there’s a carbomb a day, no matter if people are hurt or not. They use the carbomb-a-day scenario to segway into harping on more bad news, even if it’s manufactured. It’s part of the anti-war propaganda campaign. But it’s more than that. We hear oftentimes when something went wrong for the Bush administration, and seldom about the ‘wins’. When the government loses a case in court, when Marines are on trial for trumped up charges from known terrorists, or dubious mysterious ‘humanitarian’ NGOs, etc, it’s trumpeted loudly by proud leftists with extreme cases of BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome).
That’s why I think this piece at Human Events Online is important. This war, as the Bush Administration’s tenure comes to an end, is still our nation’s war, despite the fact the regular American hasn’t felt any ramifications or personal hardship because of it. It would be better if they were more tuned in to what’s going on, rather than wishing it would go away and focusing on other things. I know several people like that - unwilling to face any unpleasantness in their lives, and interestingly enough, they’re anti-war folks. They’re not willing to delve into things too deeply, and seem to look at the world through rose-colored glasses. It’s frightening to me that there are so many people like that in the world today.
This isn’t the case so much in the blogosphere, though. So I’m hoping we can take this article to heart and start harping on the GOOD things. Read Iraq the Model, Muslims Against Sharia, Amil Imani, FaithFreedom.org, Confederate Yankee, Mike’s America, The Jawa Report, Move America Forward and others who are in favor of fighting terrorism - because it’s not going to ‘go away’ because it’s unpleasant. They will use and exploit our fear, if we let them. They’re already using our multicultural liberalism and tendency toward ‘political correctness.’
In the past few weeks there has noticeable lack of reporting about the success of our forces in Iraq. The silence had been deafening. When the success of the surge was in doubt, newspapers, news shows and the internet treated us to a daily onslaught of reports on casualties, bombings and IED attacks. But now that the surge is clearly seen as working, few seem to be talking about it.
And that can make it fail.
And that’s what hysterical leftists are striving for…aiding and abetting our terrorist enemies, the democrats have someone working on their 2008 campaign who is connected to Al Qaeda. Obama’s cousin, Raila Odinga in Kenya, is behind the bloodbath because he thinks HE won - regardless of what happened at the polls. This is the typical ‘Bush stole the election’ technique - and is typical of communists who are not getting their way.
We have to make sure people see through this anti-war propaganda campaign and the 60’s radicals who are still there protesting as if it’s 40 years ago.
In a war that most experts and our enemies agree is informational in nature, communicating battlefield success is critical to shoring up U.S. public opinion and political will and thus convincing our enemies that they are fighting a war that they cannot win.
That’s why we should be propping successes and watching websites like the one that Gateway Pundit refers to quite often, Multi National Force - Iraq.
Iraq Attacks Down to 2-year Low (February 2, 2008)
See this: SHARE THE STORY.
Share the Story is a new program designed to connect U.S. military personnel with organizations and groups in their hometowns and across the country that want to hear an individual’s unique perspective on our country’s efforts in Iraq.
Service Members who are currently serving in Iraq and will be returning to the U.S. on leave or rotating back to the states have an excellent opportunity to share their story with people who want to hear it. Organizations and groups with a genuine interest in their country’s mission and an individual’s experience in Iraq have an excellent opportunity to hear that story.
Fill out the appropriate form and our outreach team will assist in making the connection between Service Member and group.
As much as possible, let’s help them share the positive things…and stand up against the tendency of the media-and others like Code Pink- to lede with what bleeds and blame America first.