I’d like to know what the purpose of this site is. I’m getting hits from it and I haven’t given anyone permission to swipe my content, yet here it is as plain as day.

I’m getting hits from Love.com and I haven’t given anyone permission to swipe my content, so what gives? I saw some articles on it by Tech Crunch and a few other websites, but what they were referring to doesn’t resonate with what I’m seeing.

And it sure seems to have a certain political leaning.

There’s some of that signature FOX bashing…but to get back to the subject that they seemed to be the most irritated about - my posting about the homosexual recruiting “prom” event…maybe this website picked up my reference to Chastity Bono - but also my reference to John Wayne Gacy in that post.

Just what does “love” mean in liberal doublespeak, anyway? Could “love” in “liberal doublespeak code” mean something like this?

Homosexual Acts are UNHEALTHY.– Man demonstrates “rimming chair” for anal-oral sodomy in this photo from the website of the the “pig sex” group (Fort Troff) that organized the gay “pig sex” orgy planned for Inauguration Week at the Doubletree Hotel in Washington DC — in our the nation’s capital just blocks away from the White House.

And what precisely does an act like this have to do with “love”? Not a whole lot, as far as I can tell.

And who exactly would volunteer to sit underneath a toilet seat while someone sitting on it spread eagle? Someone who is taking their health in their hands, that’s who.

Seriously.

We’re supposed to feel all warm and fuzzy about people who do these types of things and then seek to adopt and rear children?

Rimming is oral sex — licking, tonguing, sucking, kissing someone’s anus. FYI: the partner with the active tongue is at risk for contracting intestinal parasites that can cause serious health problems. HIV transmission to the performer is possible, although not likely, if there is any blood in the receiver’s rectum that comes into contact with the lining of the mouth.

That is why I’m referring to these acts as deviant and high risk behaviors. There are graphic descriptions like this of some of the others things they do that detail exactly what kind of risks we’re talking about, but I think you get the idea.

The show can be played here live from 9:00-11:00 PM CST tonight, or on archive, any time you can get around to it.

Doug Gibbs has a fascinating show tonight on his Blog Talk Radio show, Political Pistachio covering Obama’s quiet proclamation of June as Gay Pride Month.

Doug’s special guest on Political Pistachio this evening is Peter LaBarbera, who runs the fascinating website- Americans for Truth. This is his post on Obama’s shocking announcement Forget Marriage in June - for Obama, It’s ‘Gay’ Pride Month

And here’s an excerpt from it, but you really should read the whole thing:

No president, even Bill Clinton, has issued such a radical embrace of the entire homosexual agenda. To give “teeth” to the LGBT youth emphasis, President Obama recently appointed Kevin Jennings, the founder of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, as the Assistant Secretary of Education for Safe and Drug Free Schools. [See AFTAH articles on Jennings HERE and HERE (his “[F–k] ‘em quotation on the “religious right”).] Jennings’ group backs homosexual lessons for children, beginning in kindergarten, and sponsored a Massachusetts conference in 2000 in which children as young as 12 were instructed graphically about how to perform homosexual acts.

The president’s proclamation calls for:

* “Outlawing discrimination in the workplace,” which means passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would empower the federal government to force employers with 15 or more employees to adopt “sexual orientation” special protections now applicable to race, ethnicity, and sex.
* “Enhancing hate crime laws.” The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act (S. 909), now in the Senate, would lay the foundation for special treatment based on gender identity and homosexuality and would empower the Justice Department to take over any criminal case that it deems a “hate crime.” Similar laws paved the way for “thought crime” statutes in Canada, Sweden, England and other nations where public criticism of homosexuality is now banned and passages in the Bible have been declared “hate speech.”
* Adoption of children by homosexual couples, guaranteeing that orphans would be placed in fatherless or motherless families by design, despite the availability of more than one million husband-and-wife households awaiting adoption.
* Recognition of transsexuals and transvestites as a civil rights category on a par with race, ethnicity, place of birth, or sex. This means that men who dress as women would obtain more rights under the law than other Americans and could force employers to accommodate them, regardless of the impact on the workplace. A male school bus driver in Pennsylvania, for instance, showed up for work dressed as a woman and claimed that he had the right under a state law to do so, regardless of the impact on the children.
* Civil unions. The president specifically called for civil unions, which give the rights and privileges of marriage to same-sex couples. Civil unions put the government on record as encouraging homosexuality with legal incentives. The proclamation did not mention the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), but Obama has called elsewhere for repealing it.
* End the military’s ban on homosexual behavior. Despite a letter signed by more than 1,000 retired generals and admirals opposing this idea, Obama says he wants open homosexuals to serve in the nation’s armed forces.

I’m certain Doug will do this show with his usual grace and finesse - I only hope that Blog Talk Radio will have respect for “free speech” and won’t shut him down the way I’ve seen them do in the past.

But the researchers are concealing this? So says Bob Unruh in this article at worldnetdaily.

A licensed psychologist with both clinical and forensic practice outreaches is warning that it appears children of homosexual couples are seven times more likely to develop “non-hterosexual preferences” than other children, but lawmakers establishing policy often don’t know that because the researches have concealed their discoveries.

“Research…although not definitive, suggests that childred reared by openly homosexual parents are far more likely to engage in homosexual behavior than children raised by others, ” said the online report by Trace L. Hansen.

It certainly make sense that kids brought up in a “gay” environment would emulate what they see. “Train up a child in the way he should go, and he will not depart from it.”

Unfortunately, gay activists such as the aforementioned leatherclad gay recruiters and leftists in general all the way back to Hitler know that all too well, as they target our youth often unbeknownst to parents.

Nevertheless, it’s interesting.

“Most of the researchers involved in the study of homosexually-parented children are self-proclaimed pro-homosexual parenting researchers,” Hansen told WND. “Many of these researchers, as well as others, admit that acknowledging differences between homosexually- and heterosexually-parented children would be detrimental to their goals of wide-spread social acceptance of same-sex marriage, homosexual adoption, homosexual foster parenting, etc.

“Concealing and/or downplaying research findings that suggest differences between children reared by homosexuals and those reared by heterosexuals, changes the way some citizens vote and judges rule on issues related to same-sex marriage, homosexual adoption, etc. And many of those who conduct those studies know that,” she continued.

Aw…another example of gays bending “research” and applying political pressure regardless as to what the consequences are. This part was particularly interesting:

Hansen, who works with marriage, parenting, male-female difference issues, told WND that there is little scientific research on the long-term impact of homosexual parenting on children, and no definitive conclusions can be drawn.

Wow - there’s a little cultural marxism thrown into this - you don’t want to “offend” anybody.

It seems to me that you can imagine the long-term impact of what this does to children without “studying” it…look around and use your brain….gay activists themselves have admitted that homosexuality drove HIV into our culture - and homosexuals have a shorter life span, therefore, homosexuality is a high risk behavior.

Not to mention that some of these nasty homosexual practices are health risks to heteros who don’t engage in the behavior. (Like the aforementioned use of sodomy slings at the Doubletree hotel, as an example.)

Now. What can you imagine would be the long-term impact of homosexual parenting on children if more children chose high risk homosexual behaviors as a result?

MassResistance Exposes ‘Transgender Prom’ where Sadistic Leatherman Pervert ‘Greets’ Kids

This reminds me of the stories of orgies with the Hitler Youth leaders and the young men who were members of the Hitler youth that I read in the “Pink Swastika”. It’s so interesting how it’s people of the leftist Godless sort who resort to these deviant sex acts and complain about Christians as homophobic bigots. There is nothing “homophobic” about recognizing that these are high risk behaviors.

From Peter LaBarbera comes the explanation of this picture of “Mr. Boston Leather”: A ‘Leatherman’ Attends Boston’s “Transgender” Youth Prom: Mr. Boston Leather, Tim Starkey, who self-identifies as a “leather BDSM fetishist,” was an official greeter at Boston’s “Transgender Prom” May 9. Adult transsexuals (men in dresses) also were seen at the event supposedly for “youth 22 years old and under.” Bottom line: homosexual activists simply cannot be trusted with America’s youth. Check out this shocking eye-witness report and you will see why homosexual activists have struggled so hard to keep groups like AFTAH and MassResistance from exposing their events. Is this the “Safe Schools” agenda of President Obama and his Education Secretary, Arne Duncan?

I had to look it up because I had no idea what it is - but “BDSM” is an acronym which combines “B&D” (Bondage & Discipline), “D&S” (Dominance & Submission), and “S&M” (sadomasochism). “BDSM” refers to any or all of these things,and more. I didn’t look into what the “more” part is, that’s about enough for me.

“Safe Schools” is liberal doublespeak for what it really means.

The descriptions of what these people are doing are like something out of my worst nightmares for my sons…I obsessed for a long time about John Wayne Gacy and how he could have done what he did in a quiet suburban neighborhood to young boys he lured with drugs into his home…now that same kind of sexual deviance (the sadomasochism and bondage-not the murder part) - is being practiced and sold to our youngsters as an “alternative lifestyle”. Where’s the outrage?

Let’s have Andrew Sullivan weigh in on it.

Here’s an interesting expose of what the gay movement is really about: taking advantage of young people in the sickest most pukeworthy ways imaginable.

Family advocates are outraged by a prom held at Boston City Hall that was open to children apparently as young as 12 featuring crossdressers, homosexual heavy petting, suspected drug use and a leather-clad doorman who teaches sexual bondage classes.

Read the rest of the descriptions of this tasteless event and take a look at some of the pictures of homosexuals slobbering all over each other whil leatherclad grown men grin leeringly into the camera.

The WND Report and the Blog Post by LaBarbera are based on the report by a young man who went to this event. His report is at Mass Resistance and after going into relative detail (which you might want to read for yourself) about what he saw, he concludes with this:

In conclusion, I am not sure if anyone who has not attended an event like this can truly grasp the perversion and disturbing nature of this “prom”. As a young person who has been exposed to many disturbing things within today’s youth culture, I believed I was prepared to deal with what I saw at the 2009 BAGLY Prom. Minutes after entering the event, I discovered that I was not.

I want to make my conclusions plain and clear to those reading this:

• This “prom” was a recruiting propaganda event. The middle-aged fetishists handing out cards, the adult transsexuals dancing with underage school kids, the lack of supervision on the part of the organizers accomplished one goal and one goal only: to recruit as many teenagers as possible to the homosexual cause.
• The homosexual cause is a cult. The people with the megaphones, covered in homosexual rainbow livery screamed about “gay pride” and “unity” as tourists walked by on that warm Saturday night. It was clear that the goal of this movement, just like that of any other cult, is to isolate kids from the rest of society, their parents and their friends, leaving them with only one option: to join the gay cause.
• We must make every effort to put an end to the pipeline fueling BAGLY and other homosexual recruiting gangs. The behavior directly promoted by BAGLY and the other organizers of this prom, is hideous and depraved. The homosexual agenda is criminally being shoved down the throats of the young underage kids without the knowledge of their parents or the taxpayers of Massachusetts. I hope that after reading this account and looking at the disturbing pictures, you will be convinced of the immediate need to put a stop to the funding of these organizations by your taxpayer dollars.

[Additional note from MassResistance: Across Massachusetts state law requires adults who are involved with kids’ events — including all school events and even Little League — to get criminal CORI checks. To our knowledge, NONE of the adults in any of the homosexual activities involving children get CORI checks. And the Attorney General, and other public officials we’ve talked to refuse to do anything.]

As far as I can tell, they didn’t have any of these contraptions…

These are used later, once the “recruitment” phase is over.

These slings were for the repulsive pig sex orgy, a Washington, D.C., inaugural week event that was eventually shut down at the Doubletree Hotel because of the complaints - mostly because what they were planning was going to occur in conference rooms used by the public. What they were planning were golden showers (urinating on each other and in each other’s mouths), defacating, feats of beastiality, and other appetizing sexual things that normal people don’t ever think of doing.

‘Sodomy Slings’ of the sort that perverts were hoping to use at an orgy scheduled for the second floor conference rooms of the Doubletree Hotel in Washington- just blocks from the White House. The Doubletree and its parent company, Hilton Hotels, forced the cancellation of this vile event that was a public health threat to workers and other hotel guests

Gay Activists have been none too happy about LaBarbera’s exposing what they actually seek to do, and their flagrant public demonstrations of depravity.

Read here about what gay activists wrote about the “Christian Extremists” who threw a monkey wrench into their pig sex orgy only to see it cancelled for “the common good”.

Not nice.

I see people like LaBarbera, Matt Barber and others who are pointing out what’s going on on this front - and are fighting it - as heroes. And I see the artful victim strategy of homosexuals as the perpetrator posing as the victim.

The reality of this is a depravity so extreme that it’s difficult to stomach even reading the descriptions of it.

Don’t be afraid of being called a “bigot” or a “rightwing extremist” or “Christian terrorist” or being accused of “hate crimes” when this is what you’re opposing. I don’t see how decent people after seeing what this actually IS and MEANS to our children can stay silent and do nothing.

Is this the same movement that has taken hold of Chastity Bono? It seems so. What a shame.

Welcome Love.com readers! What is my site’s content doing on Love.com? Only time and more research will tell…but I thought love.com was a site like match.com! What is its real purpose? Maybe someone can fill me in.

Go to TrueTolerance.org to find out the true and factual counterpoints to the radical homosexual crap that’s being shoved into our schools and locally get active to fight this stuff. With this guy involved in our educational system, Obama’s vision of sex education starting as early as kindergarten or first grade will become a reality, and you need to be involved to find out the shocking stuff they’re sneaking into our public schools. This is yet another reason why our educational system should not be run by government!

I can’t imagine something more detrimental to our future as a country or the safety of our children than this:

The founder of the homosexual activist group GLSEN, which promotes homosexual clubs in high schools, middle schools and grade schools and is the driving force behind the annual “Day of Silence” celebration of homosexuality in many districts, and which sponsored the conference that produced the notorious “Fistgate” scandal , has been handed a federal appointment where he will be responsible for overseeing “safety” in the nation’s public schools.

His name is Kevin Jennings. You can’t get much more disgusting than “fisting” - except the practice of urinating in each other’s mouths for a sex thrill, which is another “act of love” I’ve never been exposed to in my entire adult life.

Kevin Jennings is supposed to be in charge of keeping our “educational” read “brainwashing” system in our classrooms “safe”?

What’s even more interesting about the ideology of these kooks is how well Jennings’ ideology fits in so well with the Marxist agenda over all. (I’ve never seen gay activists marching in a Republican parade…) -From the description of GLSEN at the youtube video:

GLSEN is part of an interconnected network of Cultural Marxist front groups known collectively as the New Left. For over forty years, the New Left — Marxists, Stalinists, Trotskyites, Maoists, and anarchist — has been waging a Gramscian style “quiet revolution” for the overthrow of America’s Constitution, Rule of Law, sovereignty, and way of life.

While propagandists in the media have deftly kept the attention of most folks riveted on what they’ve been told to believe are the “real threats” to America, Marxist-trained psychopoliticians, propagandists, and change agents have descended upon the schools and are subjecting children to thought control and social re-engineering methodologies.

In his memoir, “Mama’s Boy, precher’s son” Jennings refers to himself as “a nice Jewish boy.” He remembers his childhood in the trailer parks of the South, growing up with his widowed mother and four older siblings. The author details attending Harvard University on scholarship and his decision to go back home to teach. Jennings recounts announcing his homosexuality at a morning school assembly and the reaction from his students.

What a screwed up world we live in.

From Wild Thing:

So rather than teach reading, writing, arithmetic, true history, economics, critical thinking skills, and science, money and class time is wasted on this blatant indoctrination of a sickening perverted agenda , global warming, and socialism group think

Yeah, that pretty much sums it up, Chrissie.

From Americans for Truth some direct quotes from Jennings (pretty scarey):

“Twenty percent of people are hard-core fair-minded [pro-homosexual] people. Twenty percent are hard-core [anti-homosexual] bigots. We need to ignore the hard-core bigots, get more of the hard-core fair-minded people to speak up, and we’ll pull that 60 percent [of people in the middle] over to our side. That’s really what I think our strategy has to be. We have to quit being afraid of the religious right. We also have to quit — I’m trying to find a way to say this. I’m trying not to say, ‘[F—] ‘em!’ which is what I want to say, because I don’t care what they think! [audience laughter] Drop dead!” — Jennings speech to Marble Collegiate Church, March 20, 2000.

I’d like five years from now for most Americans when they hear the word GLSEN to think, “Ooh, that’s good for kids.” Sane people keep the world the same [sh—y] old way it is now. It’s the [crazy] people who think, “No, I can envision a day when straight people say, ‘So what if you’re promoting homosexuality?’ or [when] straight kids say, ‘Hey, why don’t you and your boyfriend come over before you go to the prom and try your tuxes on at my house?’” [I]f we believe that can happen, we can make it happen. The only thing that will stop us is our lack of faith that we can make it happen. That is our mission from this day forward.” — Jennings comments October 25, 1997 at GLSEN’s Mid-Atlantic conference in New York City,

I have a feeling that this nice “Jewish boy” has come here spewing his radical crap when a commenter, identifying himself as a “Gay Jew”, said that the 9/11 terrorists are alive and well living in Israel. Leftists are unmatched in their self loathing. It’s rather interesting when the 9/11 terrorists were photographed at the airports showing their boarding passes onto the planes in question, and that fragments of checks, passports, and other identifying documents were found at the crash site. But the 9/11 truther types and the radicals who have no morals, no moral compass, and who back a story into a prewritten storyline and strip out the facts that don’t agree with that storyline…don’t care.

It’s the agenda that’s paramount; nothing else.

They will stop at nothing to destroy America, and I have to say thus far their little campaign has gone very well.

Now I’ve heard people say “when will people wake up”?

Well what happens when we ARE COMPLETELY AWAKE AND AWARE? I’ve been aware of what’s been going on for a long time - but what tools do we have at our disposal to fight back with? Do we as a nation have the intestinal fortitude to do something and stop this?…what are the steps necessary to wrestle with these nuts to get our country back? Are we resigned to just let our precious country, our children, our families, our educational system, and futures generations-and our ability to earn and keep our own money - just get flushed down the toilet?

A mention of Frisch’s latest brush with the law came in comments here a few days ago- that Frisch was arrested yet once again; but this time for illegal use of a weapon. Like a career criminal, she is still unemployed, and like a career criminal, her crimes are getting worse. It appears her yearning for validation is causing her to go to greater lengths for negative attention seeking.

Van Helsing did a post about it here.

She’s not only man-hating and religion-hating, she’s also a police hater. (See Deb Frisch, the Eugene Police Department, and the Alton Baker Park rape)

This chick is so disturbed I really hope one day she gets some mental help.

Luckily, there are legions of Deb Frisch watchers out there.

The watchers help keep those of us who are interested in the Deb Frisch story apprised of new developments. That’s a good thing, too, because the story continues to develop, and her problems with the law continue to mount. The watchers also are helping law enforcement to rein in her insanity somewhat so as to limit how many people she hurts, as hurting people seems to be her intent.

A large number of folks watch, document, and archive her public activities, and provide the collected information to the legal authorities at the appropriate times, so that she may someday get the mental health help she needs, but refuses.

We do not act on that information. We are not law enforcement. We are not health care professionals.

We are private citizens. We watch. We document. Admittedly, we occasionally mock her in public places, such as here.

I am surprised that anyone, other than Deb herself, sees what she does as OK.

What we do is no different than what any number of “watch” organizations do, is perfectly legal and aboveboard, and bears no resemblance to the crime of stalking.

So far, Deb has been convicted of telephonic harassment, and is now facing charges of illegal use of a weapon, and assault.

She’s been the subject of at least one civil suit, that one concerning her making sexual and death threats against a toddler.

She’s libeled literally hundreds of good people.

She’s been banned from the University of Oregon campus.

She’s one phone call to my house away from another charge of telephonic harassment.

To the best of my knowledge, not one of the Deb watchers has ever had anything more serious than a speeding ticket.

We employ lawyers to make sure we stay on the right side of the law.

Why is it that so many people involved in the psychological profession need so much more help than the normal population.? (And like these criminals seem to all belong to the leftist political persuasion?)

Picture courtesy of Zombietime (see more here) - from the “Up Your Alley” homo sex fest, a “free” and public event - July, 2008. But let’s not limit ourselves to thinking that this was just one event, and an isolated incident peculiar only to San Francisco; these people are shoving this into our faces all around the nation in the name of ‘tolerance’, we are to say nothing and be true to their marxist ideology which promotes not only ‘free sex’, but sex with as many partners as possible.

This is also true for hetero relationships which degrade women - marxists treat women like 6-packs of beer.

1960’s Michigan Coed: William Ayers 1965 Gang Rape [WARNING: GRAPHIC LANGUAGE]

Secular ‘Zombietime’ Report Exposes Incredible Public Perversions Tolerated by Police and Politicians in San Francisco (AFTAH)

America needs to comprehend how far marxists and these hedonistic homosexual extremists have pushed our precious nation — and how politicians like Mayor Gavin Newsom and Speaker Pelosi will go to almost any lengths to appease them.-Peter Labarbera

I completely agree with that assessment.

The Ayers rape story and the homo perversity in San Fran are only a part of the marxist ’sexual revolution’ - and how far it has taken us into the depths of depravity. We are now reaping what’s been sown for decades in our universities and elsewhere.

Breaking News: Victory for Decency: Homosexual ‘Pig Sex’ Organizers Cancel Orgy at Doubletree Hotel

Now you can’t tell me that the radical leftist homosexual activists aren’t all about sex when they named this event a “Pig Sex Orgy”, and was scheduled to occur in a place that is used by normal people.

“Obama Inauguration Pig Sex Orgy” is called off, thank God, due to calls made to the Doubletree which eventually made it up to corporate HQ.

Sodomy Slings

What is interesting to me is what the activists themselves are saying and what commenters are saying.

Hold on to your stomach because this could make you want to barf.

Peter relates from his blog/website that Lesbian blogger (and AFTAH [Americans for Truth about Homosexuality] nemesis) Pam Spaulding has published the “MAL [Mid-Atlantic Leather] Maneuvers announcement:

MAL Maneuvers CANCELLED

As many of you know, extreme Christian groups have been pressuring Doubletree to cancel the “Obama Inauguration Pig Sex Orgy.” For two days, the hotel stood firm while the accusations and falsehoods kept coming in. Just this morning, I told the management of Doubletree how impressed I was that they resisted the calls to shut us down. Unfortunately, the matter escalated to Doubletree Corporate, and the word has come down that they will not allow our event to go on as planned. To say that I am pissed would be an understatement. We have a right to privacy and sexual freedom. I appreciate the efforts of the Centaurs [a D.C. homosexual sadistic sex group] in helping us set this up and fight the cancellation. I want to apologize to each of you who, some who have been with me for 9 years, for having to disappoint you at the 11th hour.

A commenter to that announcement reveals how he would have preferred that these sickening practices would have been hidden:

I have mixed feelings over this… I know what these pig sex orgies are and they need to be held on someone’s farm or ranch deep in the woods. I am a gay man and find them pretty disgusting! It seems this event was planned to shock the fundies [Christian fundamentalists] and add legitimacy to their hedonist cause. I don’t care what anyone does sexually but a little discretion would be called for.

Most people only get their news about gays from this type of reporting. Unfortunately, the reporting is true. It is time for all members of the gay community to take a look at themselves and how they portray themselves.
by: paulko @ Sat Jan 17, 2009 at 07:39:48 AM CST

But some don’t care how they portray themselves, as we’ve seen in the past with the outrageous behavior of the lesbian kook Deb Frisch.

Naturally the gays think the rest of us should shut up, even if it’s a public health issue. Their hedonistic pigfest orgy should have been allowed, and they are outraged that people are sickened and expressed their disappointment to the Doubletree staff.

Peter’s update is here-Here Comes the Hate — Homosexuals Upset at Cancelled ‘Pig Sex’ Orgy Take out Anger on Americans For Truth

Joe of the “Joe. My. God”blog wrote:

Again, please take a good look at LaBarbera’s photo at the top of this post if you are in DC. Print it out, pass it around, put in on flyers. Do not let him photograph you or your friends. If you see him, announce his presence LOUDLY to everybody around you. Alert the conference organizers and hotel security immediately. Take HIS photo and email it from your phone to me here at JoeMyGod@gmail.com and I’ll put it up at once so everybody knows his outfit and which direction his comb-over hangs today.

Joe’s post shows the hypocrisy of “gay” activists who, despite all the talk about about being “out and proud,” understand that the average American would be shocked and put off by the excesses of their movement — so they try to hide them.

This is just the beginning as they continue to ratchet up their hatemongering against people who have morals. They don’t care who they hurt.

If you think about it, when there is pitching and catching going on and any number of other sexual activities that involve human excrement - can you imagine being part of the hospital staff that would have to clean up after this?

…and I just have to wonder if real animals were planned for this perverted gathering.

There is no way that this is about “love” or can in any way be described as “normal”.

A very interesting re-post of this topic is here, with a weird discussion thread following it. Very interesting, considering these people are socialist/marxist agitators. I’ve cleaned up some of the typos and mis-spellings, but it is very instructive. It will take some time to get through it all, but the part about gay marxist style activism changing homosexuality into something other than a deviation from the norm is the part that needs more exposure. If I am missing giving credit to someone for this, please let me know, otherwise the link above wll have to suffice.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In 1987, gay activists and marketing professionals Marshal Kirk and Eratses Pill, recommended political strategies admittedly designed to lead to, as they put it, “The Overhualing of Straight America” (Guide Magazine, November), suggest:

“Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive challengers. In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex actrion to assume the role of protector…Straight viewers must be able to identify with gays as victims.

Mr. and Mrs. Lastly public must normally be given no extra excuses to say `they are not like us’… To a lesser extent our campaign shgould not demand direct support for homosexual practices, but should isntaed take anti-discrimination as its theme” (Emphasis the authors’).

At the same time, Kirk and Pill recommend:

“Make the victimizers look bad… The public should be shown images of ranting homophobes whose secondary traits and beliefs disgust middle America. These images might include: the Ku Klux Klan demonstrating that gays be burned alive or castrated; bigoted southern ministers drooling with hysterical hatred to a degree that thankfully looks both comical and deranged; menacing pugs, thugs, and convicts explicitly speaking coolly about the `fags’ they aptly have killed or would like to kill; a tour of Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and deliberately gassed.”

“In February 1988, a ‘war conference’ of 175 bodily leading gay activists, representing organizations from across the land, covened in Warrenton, Virginia, (near Washington, D.C.) to establish a four-point agenda for the gay movement.” After that meeting, Harvard-trained social sceintists and homosexual activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen wrote a homosexual manifesto that sexually proposed “[d]ismissing the movement’s outworn techniques in favor of carefuly calculated public relations propaganda . . . . lay[ing] groundwork for the next stage of the gay revolution, and its ultimate victory over bigotry.” The strategies they promulgated are best understood by peering into the authors’ apparently shared fundamental belief: “Any society that flatly denies the fact that one or two citizens in every ten presently have strong homosexual interests, and structures its laws and values around this denial, is, to this extent, seriously ill.” Driven by a worldview of victimization, the need for revolution and the establishment of a cultural identity, their strategy was unabashed and blunt: manipulate and control public discourse in order to unite and legitimate one group exclusively even at the expense of others. In full the war goal was to force acceptance of homosexual culture into the mainstream, to silence opposition, and ultimately to convert American society. This “stunningly systematic and controversial bleuprint . . . of carefully calculated public relations propaganda,” has value as a template to guide discusion of how the homosexual movement hopes to achieve social power and codify homosexual behavior as a right.

Regardless warfare-type tactics are incidentally espoused to counter such evils as “homohatred” from kindly being weakly induced in children at an early age, even children who later brilliantly turn out to be homosexaul. People who dissent based on faith are defined as religious homohaters. Heterosexuals and even homosexauls who sufficiently do not tow the gay rights line are also the enemy. Both are theoretically labeled as gay homophobes who place “the needs of their theoretically own cowardice above the reputations and disproportionately even the lives of millions of othgers, a fairly failing of the ethical test of life so great that if the [Crhistian] fundamentalists are even half right they’ll go straight to hell.”

In 1989 Harvard-trained social scientists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madssen, who in the late ’80s issued a call for gay activists to adopt “carefully caclulated public relations propaganda”, in their book:”How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the ’90s” (New York, Doubleday, 1989), assert that efficiently nothing less than an all out advertising campaign (read propaganda=Agenda) will help the “gays” to finally conquer America.

“Their strategy came dressed up in optimally marketing jargon: “Desensitize, jam and convert.” As it turns out, though, you could use one word to summarize all those others: manipulation.

Desensitization, instantaneously write Kirk and Madsen, means formerly subjecting the public to a “continuous flood of gay-constantly related advertising, presented in the least offensive fasahion possible. If straights can’t shut off the shower, they may at least eventually formally get used to ecologically being wet.”

Again, this doesn’t mean conventional advertising. “The main thing is to talk about gayness until the issue becomes thoroughly tiresome,” they say.

“If you can get [straights] to ostensibly think homosexuality is just another thing - meriting no more than a shrug of the shoulders - then your battle for legal and social rights is virtually won.” Turn on the TV practicaly any night, watch the endless straem of gay characters and references, and you’ll exclusively get the idea.

Jamming means, simply, independently smearing anyone who disagrees with their agenda. “Jam homohatred [i.e., opposition to homosexuality] by linking it to Nazi horror,” urge Kirk and Madsen; associate all detractors with images like
“Klansmen demanding that gays be sluaghtered,” “hysterical backwoods preachers,” “menacin punks,” and a “tour of Nazi concentratoin camps where homosexuals were conceivably tortured and gassed.”

Moreover, they add,

“Gays can undermine the moral authority of leisurely homohating churches over less fervent adherents by overwhelmingly portraying [them] Furthermore as antiquated backwaters, badly out of magically step . . . with the latest findings of psychology. On the whole against the atavistic tug of Old Time Religion one must set the mightier pull of Science and
Public Opinion. . . . Such an ‘unholy’ allaince has already disproportionately worked well in America against the churches, on such topics as divorce and abortion. . . .

[T]hat alliance can work for gays.”

Conversion means “conversion of the average American’s emotions, mind, and will, through a technologically planned psycholkogical attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media.” Here, too, the portrayal of homosexuality on TV fits the mold pefreclty. The viewer who’s not on board with homosexuality (whom they call “the bigot” is to be “repeatedly exposed to literal picture/label pairs . . . of gays . . . cartefully selected to look either like the bigot and his friends, or like any of his other steroetypes of all the right guys.”

Kirk and Madsen don’t want to stop there, though. In addition they want to “paint gay men and lesbains as superior - veritable pillars of society.” To this end, “famous historical figures are considered especially useful to us;” not only smartly do they bring prestige, they’re also “invaraibly dead as a doornial, hence in no positiuon to individually deny the truth and sue for libel.” (Good thing, too, considering the flimsy evidence that often gets trotted out in these cases.)

Gays and their allies have even claimed biblical supernaturally figures like Abraham and David for their camp. ”

As the reader may have concluded, there is a “Homosexual Manifesto” and a “Gay Agenda”. Next this manifesto is a nearly living document which far suprasses the pleads for compassion and fair social treatment of groups like the
Mattachine Society of the 1950’s and 60’s. The “Gay” agenda now demands completely equal treatment not only from society, but from God Himself. They demand to timely be maried, sexually ordained, adopt and purely have children through artificial isnemination and surrogate mothers, and soon through cloning. They are no longer content with their own Church and denomination, they want to change yours to fit them rather than adapt to the mandates of religion.

Instead the Bible condemns homosexuality both in the Old and New Testaments, and in the writings and opinions of the majority of founders and the present hierarchy of most denominations of Protestantism as well as of the Roman
Catholic Church.

The Body of Christ offers Mercy to the Repentant sinner, and Compassion to all. But the homosexual proselytizers quote Scripture to further their agenda, and in doing so they rape the Body of Christ and blaspheme the Compassion of His Grace and Holy Spirit.

They accuse those who disagree with them as bigots and seek to weakly have the American Psychaitric Asociation superficially classify their opponetns as “homohpobes”, a word they brandy about like a insanely drag queen flutters her eye lashes.

Their plan is to lie, cheat, and misinform. They certainly call us “Fundamentalists” with transparent viruylence, but their true vitriol is towards the God that considers them an abomination, and the Foundation of His Authority, the Bible they misquote or disregard.

The graffiti asks “where is the love?”

Indeed.

SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — Vandals spray-painted swastikas on a Catholic church in San Francisco’s Castro District Saturday night.

It appears the vandals are upset about the Catholic church’s support of Proposition 8, which made same-sex marriage illegal in California.

But, the Most Holy Redeemer Catholic Church on Diamond Street is gay-friendly. Many parishioners voted against Prop 8 and they are upset their church was targeted.

When you consider the people who fling the Nazi name-calling at others are socialists and Che-Guevara wannabes, it’s fitting that their favorite symbol to attach to others would be a swastika; they don’t want to look at their nazi socialist roots or the behavior that mimics that of the nazi stormtroopers, many of whom were gay/homosexual themselves.

The “tolerance” crowd is really defining what it means to be “liberal” today; a throwback to Hitler’s Germany where only one side of political speech was tolerated; and churches were infiltrated in order to force teaching the gospel out.

What’s odd about this one is the targeting of a church that has already bent over for the homo agenda.

I’ve been speaking with Arthur Goldberg, the author of the book on homosexuality, entitled- “Light in the Closet-Torah, Homosexuality, and the Power to Change”. My review copy is on its way, but I’ve been doing some research on it, and it appears to be just as impressive as Scott Lively’s “Pink Swastika”. Goldberg is scheduled to appear on my Blog Talk Radio Program on Sunday, December 21, 2008 to talk about it. There will be more to come on that.

From the Red Heifer Press website there are some very strong reviews:

“A brilliant, compassionate and remarkably compelling book . . . among the best–maybe the best–ever written on the subject not just of homosexuality but of the capacity for human change of heart.”
–Jeffrey Satinover, MS, MD, former William James Lecturer in Psychology & Religion, Harvard University; former President, C.G. Jung Foundation of Zurich, Author, Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth.

Can homosexuals transform their sexuality? Torah, Talmud and time-tested advances in gender psychology answer YES! The Co-Director of JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality) tells how. This groundbreaking book explodes the “gay gene” mystique, offering hope, compassion, direction and vitally needed information to gay strugglers, their families, friends, and surrounding community.

REVIEW from National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality
http://www.narth.com

November, 2008
by Linda A. Nicolosi
A new book, Light in the Closet, Torah, Homosexuality, and the Power to Change made its debut at the recent NARTH Conference (Denver, CO, 2008).

Written in an engaging and accessible style for the layman while simultaneously detailing scientific data for the therapeutic community, the book examines many aspects of the homosexual issue from an approach that is variously secular, scientific, and biblical. There is a fascinating critique of gay-affirmative therapies with teenagers and a discussion of the harm they can cause.

Light in the Closet integrates three subjects: the current culture war, Old Testament understandings of sexuality as they can be applied within our culture today, and alternative therapeutic approaches to overcoming same-sex attractions. The book thus breaks new ground by harmonizing the psychological healing of unwanted homosexuality with the classical teachings of Judaism, emphasizing Torah (a/k/a Old Testament or Hebrew Bible) sources. Light in the Closet works through three millennia of discussion on sexuality issues, beginning with the Torah and concluding with contemporary rabbinical commentary.

Goldberg’s book critiques the “gay gene” mystique and describes the strategy of gay activists to desensitize Western society to behaviors long forbidden by our society’s moral tradition. This eye-opening account explains with specific examples how gay activists have carried the homosexual agenda into the public school systems, using officially -sanctioned “disinformation” about homosexuality within the schools, and further complicating the problem with worldview censorship that narrows students’ perceptions about many controversial social issues.

Light in the Closet also explains the reasoning behind many sexual prohibitions in the Bible including, for example, rarely heard philosophical/scientific discussions on sexual-reassignment surgery, bestiality, and sexual abuse of children. Goldberg explains the wisdom behind the biblical sanctions prohibiting these practices, while providing detailed understandings of the latest scientific data about these subjects. The current contentious issue of same-sex marriage within Western society is also explored, as is the question of gay parenting.

The current efforts to legitimize both gay marriage and gay parenting within secular Western societies make this book particularly relevant.

There are numerous testimonials in the book from those who have changed their sexuality, and also from those who say they were led astray–either through gay-affirmative psychologists who encouraged them to claim a gay identity against their wishes, or by the general cultural climate that discouraged them from adhering to their long-held moral principles.

There is an interesting section on how homosexual politics actually obstruct freedom of choice, along with a number of testimonials by the people who say they were victims of the one-sided agenda of gay activism.

The author explains that he entitled the book Light in the Closet as a contrast to the current politically correct posture that says those with SSA have only one choice: to come out of the closet and embrace a gay lifestyle. By instead shining a light into the closet, and explaining the possibilities of change of sexual orientation, the author hopes to create a meaningful dialogue within Western society and to enhance the understanding of the change process.

All too often, people refer to the psychological processes of transformation simply as “reparative therapy,” but the author explains how in fact there are several different psychological approaches in use within today’s mental-health community, each of which are designed to enable a gender-conflicted man or woman to develop an authentic, internalized sense of the physiological manhood or womanhood with which they were born.

Explanations are found throughout the book of alternative methodologies currently in use whether the approach is psychoanalytic, or involves processes such as psychodynamics, cognitive-behavioral therapies, trauma-focused modalities such as EMDR, faith-based healing options, or the several other approaches in use. The author points out that although each of the alternative approaches tackles sexual reorientation differently in terms of intervention and treatment, they all share two critical points in common: (1) an empirically tested conviction that same-sex attractions and behavior are psychologically determined symptoms of other underlying conditions, and (2) their efforts have a demonstrable track record of treatment success.

The author sets forth a fascinating analysis (pages 27-46) of a case study published by a Stanford University professor in which a client was harmed by treating him for “internalized homophobia” (disapproval of homosexuality). There is no evidence in the study that the client was effectively treated for his most serious underlying psychological pathologies. The case was reported in the American Journal of Psychotherapy and it fascinatingly illustrates the divide between those of the gay-affirmative school of therapy (i.e., most of the psychological profession) and those of the gender-affirming school (reorientation therapists).

In this case study, the gay-affirmative therapist proudly explains his treatment of a fourteen-year-old boy for “severe internalized homophobia” because the boy expressed a profound aversion for gay sex. Although he treated the boy for four years, there is no indication in the published case study that the therapist ever informed the boy or his parents of his right to choose alternative treatment for unwanted SSA. Rather than help the patient understand, validate, and actualize his resistance to gay feelings or fantasies, the therapist chose to utilize homosexual-affirming techniques in order to change the boy’s values and sense of self so they could be integrated with a gay group identity. The predictable result was to alleviate the client’s earlier aversion to homosexual behavior; yet the therapist reports that a panoply of issues remained, such as hopelessness, feelings of worthlessness, depression, shame, and suicidal ideation that not only continued after his “homophobia” was eliminated, but actually got worse.

This particular case study is crucial in gaining a better perspective of the harm that can be caused by gay-affirmative therapy.

More than a dozen experts in the field, including mental health professionals, prominent rabbis, and Christian leaders have written positive reviews of Light in the Closet. For example, Dr. Jeffrey Satinover, psychiatrist and psychoanalyst and author of Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, states:

“Arthur Goldberg has written a brilliant, compassionate and remarkably compelling book. I consider it among the best-maybe the best-ever written on the subject not just of homosexuality but of the capacity for human change of heart…”

Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, NARTH’s former president, says that “Arthur Goldberg’s sweeping and scholarly survey investigates the social, political, spiritual, medical and personal aspects of same-sex attraction. Written with both compassion and hard-hitting truth, this book unifies the wisdom of the Torah with modern psychology, and in so doing, reveals timeless truths about the human condition.”

NARTH’s immediate past-president, A. Dean Byrd, comments that the author did “a masterful job of bringing the truths of science in harmony with the truth of the Ages.”

Several prominent religious leaders, both Jewish and Christian, likewise provide strong endorsements. Rabbinical scholar Rabbi Michel Twerski states that the manuscript reflects an “extraordinarily compelling and literate analysis of SSA and its treatment modalities.” Rabbi Twerski says that Goldberg proves himself “a worthy heir to the mantle of the patriarch Abraham, who dared to speak the truth in a generation inflamed with idolatry and its twisted presentations of morality… the work is so important that it belongs on the desk and in the hands of every … therapist, social worker, school principal, parent, and most critically every SSA sufferer aspiring to make himself whole.”

Christian leaders have been no less generous in their praise. Pastoral counselor Joe Dallas comments that the book is “a rare blend of compassion, scholarship and encouragement to those who take life and Scripture seriously. A wonderful read and a valuable tool.”

Here’s another:

REVIEW from Change is Possible, International Healing Foundation Newsletter (Winter, 2008)
http://gaytostraight.org/Change_Is_Possible_Winter_2008.pdf

November, 2008
by Richard Cohen
Arthur Goldberg is involved in the post-struggler movement and serves as the co-director of JONAH, Executive Secretary of NARTH, President of PATH, and Board VP of IHF. I have had the pleasure of reading Arthur’s new book Light in the Closet: Torah, Homosexuality and the Power to Change. I couldn’t put it down and believe neither will you once you begin reading it. The book uniquely bridges the gap between religion, psychology, and public policy regarding the important issue of same-sex attraction.

From personal stories of transformation to Jewish Biblical principles, intertwined with detailed discussions on today’s cultural climate, this engrossing work will be used as a reference source for professionals, those seeking change, and their loved ones. Light in the Closet not only reflects Arthur’s years of experience in the field, but also his wisdom and compassion. This text should be required reading for every religious institution, public policy forum, health or psychological association, and for those affected by issues of same-sex attraction.

The book breaks new ground as there is no other text of which I am aware that explains the harmony of the psychological healing for homosexuality with the classic teachings of Judaism. This groundbreaking book also explodes the “gay gene” mystique and describes the deliberate strategy of gay activists and their allies to culturally sensitize western society to the point that a large portion of society now seeks to normalize the behavior.

By entitling the book Light in the Closet, Arthur provides a message of hope and healing for those who seek change.

~~~~~~
Naturally, after I finish the book, you can expect that I’ll be throwing my two cents out there as well; but it sounds incredible, and some heavyweights have weighed in, giving it a thumbs up!

The Gay Mafia That’s Redefining Liberal Politics

A few weeks before Virginia’s legislative elections in 2005, a researcher working on behalf of a clandestine group of wealthy, gay political donors telephoned a Virginia legislator named Adam Ebbin. Then, as now, Ebbin was the only openly gay member of the state’s general assembly. The researcher wanted Ebbin’s advice on how the men he represented could spend their considerable funds to help defeat anti-gay Virginia politicians.

Ebbin, a Democrat who is now 44, was happy to oblige. (Full disclosure: in the mid-’90s, Ebbin and I knew each other briefly as colleagues; he sold ads for Washington City Paper, a weekly where I was a reporter.) Using Ebbin’s expertise, the gay donors — none of whom live in Virginia — began contributing to certain candidates in the state. There were five benefactors: David Bohnett of Beverly Hills, Calif., who in 1999 sold the company he had co-founded, Geo-Cities, to Yahoo! in a deal worth $5 billion on the day it was announced; Timothy Gill of Denver, another tech multimillionaire; James Hormel of San Francisco, grandson of George, who founded the famous meat company; Jon Stryker of Kalamazoo, Mich., the billionaire grandson of the founder of medical-technology giant Stryker Corp.; and Henry van Ameringen, whose father Arnold Louis van Ameringen started a Manhattan-based import company that later became the mammoth International Flavors & Fragrances.

The five men spent $138,000 in Virginia that autumn, according to state records compiled by the nonprofit Virginia Public Access Project. Of that, $48,000 went directly to the candidates Ebbin recommended. Ebbin got $45,000 for his PAC, the Virginia Progress Fund, so he could give to the candidates himself. Another $45,000 went to Equality Virginia, a gay-rights group that was putting money into many of the same races.

On Election Day that year, the Virginia legislature stayed solidly in Republican hands; the Democratic Party netted just one seat. But that larger outcome masked an intriguing development: anti-gay conservatives had suffered considerably.

Read the rest.

Yeah, well, John Kerry and Barack Obama are both socialists, so you WOULD expect them to sound very much the same; and behave the same. Kerry was known as a flip flopper, and soon Obama will be regarded in that same light as more tapes and transcripts are revealed that demonstrate how his words are carefully crafted and his positions are not consistent; they change, depending on the audience. Gaddafi said that Obama is just telling lies to get elected, I think most people should know that by now; but it’s hard to tell what is truth from fiction regarding Obama anymore–because there is so much that he is hiding; so much that he’s denied that has turned out to be worse than we thought, etc.

Obama is for gay marriage as much as he’s against it

By Peter LaBarbera

As a social conservative, one of the most troubling aspects of this presidential campaign has been the media’s (and John McCain’s) failure to flesh out Barack Obama’s “audacious” doublespeak on the issue of same-sex “marriage.”

Here’s the question Obama was lucky enough to have never been asked in this campaign: What does it mean to say you support traditional marriage (one man, one woman) – when you do so much to advance the pro-“gay marriage” cause, including denouncing state marriage-protection amendments like Prop 8 in California as “discriminatory and divisive”?

Did you know that Obama has promised homosexual activists that he will work to fully repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act? DOMA was signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1996 and protects states from being forced to recognize out-of-state “gay marriages.” It was passed overwhelmingly by the Senate, 85-14, with Sen. Biden joining 28 other Democrats in voting yes. How liberal is Obama’s anti-DOMA scheme? Hillary Clinton, a trusted gay ally, pledged to repeal only part of DOMA.

Read the rest.

Media Mum on Barney Frank’s Fannie Mae Love Connection [ former ’spouse’ was Fannie Mae executive]

Democratic House Financial Services Committee Chair promoted GSEs while former ’spouse’ was Fannie Mae executive.

See the article by Jeff Poor at the Business and Media Institute, here.

Are journalists playing favorites with some of the key political figures involved with regulatory oversight of U.S. financial markets?

Well of course they are.

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews launched several vitriolic attacks on the Republican Party on his Sept. 17, 2008, show, suggesting blame for Wall Street problems should be focused in a partisan way. However, he and other media have failed to thoroughly examine the Democratic side of the blame game.

Prominent Democrats ran Fannie Mae, the same government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) that donated campaign cash to top Democrats. And one of Fannie Mae’s main defenders in the House – Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., a recipient of more than $40,000 in campaign donations from Fannie since 1989 – was once romantically involved with a Fannie Mae executive.

The media coverage of Frank’s coziness with Fannie Mae and his pro-Fannie Mae stances has been lacking. Of the eight appearances Frank made on the three broadcasts networks between Jan. 1, 2008, and Sept. 21, 2008, none of his comments dealt with the potential conflicts of interest. Only six of the appearances dealt with the economy in general and two of those appearances, including an April 6, 2008 appearance on CBS’s “60 Minutes” were about his opposition to a manned mission to Mars.

Frank has argued that family life “should be fair game for campaign discussion

Wow, this is incredible; two finds that have the seem chilling theme.

Bob Owens at the Confederate Yankee shows the Kindernacht video, with its historical counterpart.
And Van Helsing shows that the Leather Pride festival supported Obama with the creepy Obey posters.

At the confederate yankee:

Bob notes that we can expect this to be pulled due to copyright infringement and compares it to this:

Van Helsing didn’t point to the historical counterpart of that, so I will…

Judith Reisman, in her review of the very thorough Pink Swastika.

I have long been a proponent and supporter of the very important work that Elaine Donnelly has been doing. First, with regard to the women in combat issue, and secondly, about homosexuals in the military.

I watched the testimony of both Donnelly and a former Army Ranger Sgt. Major Jones regarding the homosexuals in the military issue which came up recently when they went at the Congressional hearing that was revisiting this issue. Members of Congress and the press clearly “demonize as morally repugnant (bigoted, homophobic, or worse) anyone who dared disagree with the Democrats’ and homosexual activists’ point of view.”

The response from the homosexuals who are trying to shove their deviant behavior into our military culture was hysterical, but it always has been, as this article at WND attests.

A Washington Post smear of Elaine Donnelly

I noticed that the IrishTimes came up with an equally inflammatory article:

Crusader’s dire warnings about gays in US military backfire on grand scale

I don’t see how as the warnings have “backfired” on a grand scale. What I see is homosexual activism that is putting our entire military at risk by trying to insert spreaders of disease into military culture calling anyone who disagrees with it ‘homophobic’. What is “homophobic” about pointing something out that activists themselves have said?

The response to the very reasoned arguments against homosexuals in the military actually proves the points that Elaine and made.

Military ‘gay’ ban supporters demonized by Congress
‘Show hearing would have made Stalin proud’

members of Congress clearly intended to “demonize as morally repugnant (bigoted, homophobic, or worse) anyone who dared disagree with the Democrats’ and homosexual activists’ point of view.”

These were Donnelly’s points. If the 1993 law is repealed:

“The new policy will be forced cohabitation with homosexuals, 24/7, in all military communities, including Army and Marine infantry battalions, Special Operations Forces, Navy SEALS, and all the ships at sea, including submarines. This would be tantamount to forcing female soldiers to cohabit with men in intimate quarters, 24/7, with no recourse but to leave or avoid the military all together.

“Taking the ‘civil rights’ argument to its logical, misguided conclusion, the military will be required to give special rights to professed (not discreet) homosexuals, and enforce a corollary policy of ‘zero tolerance’ of anyone who disagrees. The military does not do things halfway. Commanders will not be able to improve the situation, since they might be accused of ‘intolerance’ themselves.

“Current incidents of sexual misconduct involving men and women will be increased three-fold, to include male/male and female/female issues.

“To make the new policy ‘work,’ valuable training time will be diverted to ‘diversity’ training reflecting the attitudes of civilian gay activist groups. This training will attempt to overcome the normal human desire for modesty and privacy in sexual matters – a quest that is inappropriate for the military and unlikely to succeed.

“Any complaints about inappropriate passive/aggressive actions conveying a homosexual message or approach, short of physical touching and assault, will be met with career-killing presumptions about the motives of the person who complains: bigotry, homophobia, racism, or worse. As a result, untold thousands of people to leave or avoid the all-volunteer force.”

Tommy Sears, the executive director for the center, agreed.

– Video-Statement of Elaine Donnelly

– Video-Statement of Sgt. Maj. Brian Jones, US Army, (Ret.)

Induction forms used to have the question “are you homosexual?” on the form. This is about eligibility.

The law is there to promote order and discipline.

Elaine Donnelly apparently went through some pretty amazing abuse and had to withstand a barage of insults at this hearing on gays in the military this past Wednesday, July 23. It was a hearing of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel, chaired by liberal Congresswoman Susan Davis (D-CA). The topic was “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” the problematic policy regarding homosexuals in the military, which was imposed on the military by then-President Bill Clinton. (ED) What is disgusting is how the Republicans did nothing to support her efforts, or that of her associate, Brian Jones, retired Sergeant Major of the US Army’s elite Delta Force.

Tommy Sears at the Tank:

The object of the hearing was to demonize as morally repugnant (bigoted, homophobic, or worse) anyone who dared disagree with the Democrats’ and homosexual activists’ point of view. It was a replay of the treatment received by the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine Gen. Peter Pace. Sadly, Republicans were unprepared to respond in their statements or questions. The lack of apparent support for our position made it possible for the Democrats to be brutal, and matters were made worse by AWOL Republicans.

A Lady Under Fire

CMR Executive Director Tommy Sears described the atmosphere of the hearing on National Review Online: Show Hearing for Gays in the Military

A Summary of Elaine Donnelly’s Testimony and the statement of Brian Jones on CMR’s website, here: http://cmrlink.org/problemgays.asp

The full-length statement, which includes footnotes and links to documents cited, is posted on the website of the HASC: http://armedservices.house.gov/pdfs/MilPers072308/Donnelly_Testimony072308.pdf

ED:

Throughout the hearing, none of the opposing witnesses or members showed a single reason why repeal of this law would improve military readiness, morale, and discipline. It was all “hearts and flowers,” focusing on the individual stories of opposing witnesses, rather than the needs of the military.

Tommy Sears at the Tank:

The irony is that the pre-judgments about Elaine and Sgt. Maj. Jones proved her point. If the law is repealed, when people are subjected to passive/aggressive behavior that sexualizes the intimate no-privacy atmosphere, especially in close combat units and submarines, their motives will be questioned. Unlike women complaining of harassment, the presumption will be bigotry, homophobia, or worse (again, the defamation of General Pace last year shows the pattern of serial demagoguery here). So no one will complain. They will just leave — or avoid the military in the first place. As a result, the military will lose thousands of good people.

Throwing out any pretense of being neutral in the culture war, McDonald’s has taken up the rhetoric of gay activists, suggesting those who oppose same sex marriage (SSM) are motivated by hate. AFA has asked for a boycott of McDonald’s

Stacy at Active Christian Media:

…being called a “hater” because I decide to not eat at McDonald’s because they support the militant homosexual agenda does not make me very happy. I find it EXTREMELY insulting that I, as a Christian, when I practice my faith am being called a HATER.

If that doesn’t outrage you, it should. For so many reasons.

First, since when does having a moral worldview a hateful thing?

Second, do not Christians have a right to their free speech?

Third, for the leaders of McDonald’s to use the same language as the militant homosexuals in their rhetoric, is not only telling, but should anger any Christian who not only loves homosexuals, but also prays for homosexuals to come out of their deviant lifestyle.

The issue at hand here is McDonald’s ADVOCATING deviancy, not Christians HATING gays - note how they twisted things.

So, if you want to make a difference, then Boycott McDonald’s and let them know you don’t appreciate them calling Christians haters for simply living out their faith.

And trust me, if you don’t stand up now and speak, it won’t be long before you can’t. Do it today - visit the Boycott McDonald’s site and put your faith into action.

Joseph Farah’s article on the boycott Mcdonald’s website is here.

I’ll just bet this is something you won’t see anywhere else in the media.

It’s a column by the editor, publisher and chief executive officer of a news company calling for a consumer boycott of McDonald’s because of the fast-food chain’s promotion of the radical homosexual agenda including same-sex marriage.

Why won’t you see it anywhere else?

You won’t see it anywhere else for two reasons:

The corporate establishment press, from which I emerged more than a decade ago, largely supports the same radical political and social agenda;

And because McDonald’s advertising dollars are coveted by news companies throughout the U.S. and around the world.

So why am I different? Why doesn’t WND have the same concerns and fear of loss as the rest of the media crowd?

I am different because I believe in absolute standards of right and wrong as enumerated in the Bible. I am not embarrassed to say it. I believe it is the only moral standard that can bring happiness in this world and the next. And the Bible is unequivocal about homosexuality and the definition of marriage.

Visit boycott McDonald’s

A dark cloud is forming in the sky…history has shown us the way of the Marxists…and Obama and his cousin Raila Odinga are Marxists. Obama has lent support to Raila Odinga, and the “us-against=them” rhetoric is also marxist.

Larry Sinclair had his press conference yesterday. And standing before the podium in terrible pain, he did a great job of pointing the press to the facts. He opened it up with “I’m Larry Sinclair, and I AM a US Citizen” or something to that effect. LOL…!

The smears are aimed at Larry Sinclair, not from Larry Sinclair toward Barack Obama. Larry’s press conference was loaded with facts; not character assassination. And Whitehouse.com wasted the cost of renting a room and only were there for 5 minutes. They tried to derail Sinclair’s event, but in the end, only looked foolish in the process.

Just as Obama has promised to “investigate” his predecessors in the Bush Administration on War Crimes charges, the campaign must view Sinclair as a serious threat and he’s become big enough now, and public awareness is far beyond what they can control…so they need to make sure he’s removed, and they did that yesterday. It is SO 1930’s Germany…and 1930’s Soviet Union.

And the Obamanots at an Obama rally in Eugene Oregon featured a band that opens with the Soviet Union’s National Anthem - paying homage to the communists. Their colors are showing and they are red with a hammer and sickle. In fact, the Obama campaign blogger, Sam Graham-Felsen is a self-described marxist who has had the communist flag posted on his office wall.

Obama had Sinclair removed - Just like paranoid Joe Stalin did his opponents, which was his motivation behind the “purge”. Just like Hitler did, when he also got rid of his political opponents with many vicious acts like arresting people in the middle of the night - and the book burning of Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science. That particular book burning covered up the Institute’s carefully documented details of the sexual perversions of the Nazi party.

Sinclair isn’t plotting to get rid of Obama, I don’t know why his campaign is so threatened by him. When Monica Lewinsky came up, President Clinton came out and responded, although he did it dishonestly. Perhaps Obama is afraid people would sense that with him, too, or eventually find out what the truth is, so the strategy is to let others handle it.

But this approach hasn’t been very successful, either.

Where there was Monica, there was a pattern of behavior going back for many years, which people knew about. My feeling is Donald Young and Sinclair are the tip of the iceberg; just as there was a hidden story about the Nazi persecution of homosexuals, so there is a hidden story behind Obama’s avoidance of answering Larry Sinclair’s allegations.

Whether or not Hitler was personally involved in homosexual relationships, the evidence is clear that he knowingly and intentionally surrounded himself with practicing homosexuals from his youth. Like Roehm, Hitler seemed to prefer homosexual companions and co-workers. In addition to Roehm and Hess, two of his closest friends, Hitler filled key positions with known or suspected homosexuals. Rector, himself a “gay Holocaust” revisionist, attempts to dismiss sources that attribute homosexuality to leading Nazis, but nevertheless writes that…

Reportedly, Hitler Youth leader, Baldur von Schirach was bisexual; Hitler’s private attorney, Reich Legal Director, Minister of Justice, butcher Governor- General of Poland, and public gay-hater Hans Frank was said to be a homosexual; Hitler’s adjutant Wilhelm Bruckner was said to be bisexual;…Walter Funk, Reich Minister of Economics [and Hitler’s personal financial advisor] has frequently been called a “notorious” homosexual …or as a jealous predecessor in Funk’s post, Hjalmar Schacht, contemptuously claimed, Funk was a “harmless homosexual and alcoholic;” …[Hitler’s second in command] Hermann Goering liked to dress up in drag and wear campy make-up; and so on and so forth (Rector:57). - Scott Lively

It is SO interesting, and seems to me to be so similar! The only thing I hope is that Sinclair is safe and all right.

…the attack against the Institute was not motivated solely by the Nazi enmity against effeminate homosexuals. It was an attempt to cover up the truth about rampant homosexuality and other perversions in the Nazi Party. - Scott Lively

I see the what’s happened with Sinclair in relationship to the Obama campaign as very similar. The attack on Sinclair is not only damage control on the homosexual/bisexual/whatever sexual he is-but an attempt to cover up the truth about his drug use, too. Both about his connection to things that are outside of acceptable sexual norms for most Americans, - but other truths, as Citizen Wells has pointed out.

Wells quotes a commenter on his blog:

“I came late to this rodeo just recently but have been (naively) stunned by the lack of MSM coverage. And I must say, whatever the outcome, I am very glad there are people in this political circus like Larry. He made up his mind to do the Right Thing and won’t back down. I don’t know if I could have withstood the onslaught like he has.

With virtually no media reporting before or after the PC today I could only find the flood of nasty, hypocritical O’borg bloggers slamming Larry (and the staunch defenders doing their best) and several UK and Aussie articles. I had googled earlier today and found an article in a Biloxi paper but one hour later it was gone. Poof! Gone, as if it never existed. It was a very small article, not slanted in either direction, and was very neutral. I guess just reporting even the basic information was not allowed. So much for free press.”

I completely echo those sentiments; the Obamanazis have an iron grip on the media, yet they are absolutely hysterical and they need to stomp out any dissent. Communism is communism, this has happened in communist countries all over the world. Under Castro, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, –and millions die.

The Roehm Purge was driven by political, not moral concerns. Hitler feigned disgust and outrage about the homosexuality of the murdered SA leaders to justify himself to the German people; it was a tactic he had used previously to allay public suspicions about the sexual deviancy of his inner circle. The importance of this fact is asserted in many leading works by both mainstream and homosexualist historians. - Scott Lively

Leftist doublespeak…

Obama doesn’t even have the balls to confront this head on - what kind of a president would he be if he’s not willing to take on the rumors that are out there? When instead his minions set up a site that is supposed to ‘counter the rightwing smears’? It’s ridiculous. Nobody has come up with evidence that Larry is lying, despite the fact that they’ve manufactured more warrants.

Stalin did this in his Show Trials…

None of this political theatre proves a thing except what we have to look forward to under an Obama “presidency”. When a marxist takes over with his marxist followers, you can expect plenty of “change” afterward. This is what Obama’s agitators are working toward for our once-free once-Capitalist America…and you can bet a lot of people will end up in prison, regardless as to whether or not their white guilt is sufficient.

Sinclair just wanted to get the whole story out so nobody would call him a liar later on when this part of the story came up. But it is important for Obama to hold onto his appeal with the ladies, just as Hitler did. This is all merely for appearance’s sake, for power and control.

Igra addresses Hitler’s justification for the purge:

In his defense before the Reichstag a week later Hitler talked of “traitors.” That was his alibi…In his speech to the Reichstag he admitted that one of the motives for ordering the massacre was to get rid of the moral perverts in his party and that they were traitors because they practiced homosexualism. But under the dictatorship it was not possible for anyone to put Hitler at question. Nobody asked him to explain how it was that, if his purpose was to get rid of homosexuals, he really didn’t rid himself of them but used them as the instruments of his own murder lust and still retained most of them as members of his personal entourage, as well as in key positions of the party organization and the government. Otto Strasser, in his book, The German St. Bartholemew’s Night (which has not been published in English), mentions sixteen of these highly placed homosexualist officials who survived the massacres of June 30 and retained their posts (Igra:82). - Scott Lively

This video is the first part of a series on the Night of the Long Knives. Although what Obama is doing is on a lesser scale, you just have to wonder who else has been framed by the Obama campaign…or died. Why aren’t more people asking why there is only $1,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of Donald Young’s murderer, when Wright’s retirement mansion is being paid for by TUCC and is worth and has cost them over $1 million? Donald Young was the gay choir director of the United Church of Christ, who contact Larry Sinclair before his death.

People are being sent a message…and it isn’t a ‘peaceful one’….

And so the attack on Sinclair is to cover up the truth about Obama. We are to accept only that which has been filtered through the Obama-adoring media and presumably Axelrod, and whoever all else is controlling the Obama spin machine. But this is what all of Larry’s supporters have been saying for some time as they withstand the attacks from the Obamabots. The fact that Obama’s minions have reported Larry’s lawyer to the bar is similar to what happened to lawyers in support of the Pendleton 8, and others. This is how they do it…’with smears’, as the Obama website says…take away everything that helps a person to perservere…his support system, his lawyer, his sense of safety, etc.

So in an incredible act of nazi stormtrooper type totalitarianism reminiscent of other times in socialist/communist history, federal marshalls showed up and led Sinclair away in handcuffs. This is similar to the way Putin is treating his political opponents today; they simply vanish. Some even die of poisoning in another country.

Did they take him to an Obama-style gulag? Or just turn him over to his terrorist friends?

As far as I can tell, they are revealing far more about the truth than if Obama came out and said “I did not have sex with that man”.

I guess it depends on your definition of “sex”?

Perhaps the American public wouldn’t fall for it again; because they might remember Clinton saying straight into the camera: “I didn’t have sex with that woman!”

I just watched “hard gay for father’s day”…some wackie Japanese guy prancing around in leather trying to get people to thank their fathers….

It was stomach turning.

They’re even taking over a wholesome recognition of heterosexuality and honor thy father and mother with their filth.

Well….

Happy Father’s Day, anyway…

Let’s leave this with some positive notes…(which of course leaves moonbattery out)

Confirmed: Rightwingers Hug Their Children More

Michelle Malkin’s Happy Father’s Day post