Welcome Larry Sinclair readers!!!!
First, what the hell is George Soros-funded, Ralph Nader’s Public Citizen Litigation Group doing supporting Larry Sinclair’s detractors? The court filings representing mzmolly, TubeSockTedD, OWNINGLIARS and the Democratic Underground were put together by Public Citizen Litigation Group. I find this incredibly interesting. Public Citizen’s involvement shows that it is going to bat for the Obama campaign…and it’s not surprising, considering that Ted Kennedy and a bunch of democrats endorse it. To my knowledge, however, its purpose was not to defend citizens from litigation - it was to go after corporations. The last I knew, Larry Sinclair isn’t a corporation.
[Public Citizen] claims to represent the interests of American consumers by fighting “for openness and democratic accountability in government; for the right of consumers to seek redress in the courts; for clean, safe and sustainable energy sources; for social and economic justice in trade policies; for strong health, safety and environmental protections; and for safe, effective and affordable prescription drugs and health care.” The means by which PC generally believes these goals can be achieved is increased government intervention and litigation against corporations — a practice founded on the premise that American corporations, like the capitalist system of which they are a part, are inherently inclined toward corruption.
They don’t, of course, take any responsibility for their being corrupt themselves.
Litigation Group: Litigating at all levels of the federal and state judiciaries, this division of Public Citizen “specializes in cases involving health and safety regulation, consumer rights, access to the courts, open government, and the First Amendment, including Internet free speech.”
Well, we can strike out health and safety regulation (because they’re the ones making death threats against Larry Sinclair; if anyone has a fear about his health and safety it’s Sinclair), consumer rights, access to the courts and open government. I guess it falls under the heading of First Amendment, including internet free speech. I guess they consider “internet free speech” such that you can tell lies and defame people under stupid pseudonyms.
It’s a “consumer rights” organization. It’s interesting to me that the Democratic Underground is consider a “consumer” here. Not that that particular side of the aisle is interesting in abiding by its own rules or that of the court, anyway…they make them up as they go along!
These people have terrorized Sinclair, called him a mental patient, and a bunch of other lies - I think they should be held responsible for it.
They object to having their star, the shifty messiah, to be forced to show up in court to answer the allegations; but seeing how artful the campaign has been to skirt the issue, I don’t see that there’s any other way to even get through to Obama or his campaign -or Axelrod, since they don’t return phone calls, and they don’t behave like human beings, or act like they need to answer to anyone. That leads me to believe it will be much the same if Obama becomes president…he thinks he knows what’s best for the rest of us, just like the moonbats at the DU, and the marxists blogging for Obama who try to generate the most flattering propaganda for the knuckledragging masses who are treating him more like a rock star than a candidate for president.
If the fact that I’m not a “marxist” makes me “right wing”, then so be it, I’ll gladly take the hit for that distinction.
The expensive lawyers who’ve magically appeared in the court proceedings in the Larry Sinclair saga have featured this blog and the comments that Larry has made here, taking his comments out of context in order to prolong this thing. Also, my blog talk radio show has become somewhat of a hit in those filings, too.
What is concerning me is their tactic of trumping up hundreds of pages of lies that have to be answered by Larry’s attorney. Larry’s attorney is only one guy - and what he’s up against is legions of the National Lawyers Guild (commie) genre. They are betting that Larry’s limited resources will help them win in the end, rather than the truth.
The ‘other side’ has revealed Larry’s social security number and other information that was not required by the court, in order to purposely put his safety even further at risk.
They continue to break the law!!!
They complain that Larry is using the courts in order for the truth to come out, and use that as the reasoning for the truth not to come out.
Larry and his lawyer need all the support we can lend them. To me this is a classic modern day David and Goliath story!!
Kudos to Larry for hanging in there!
Though Public Citizen claims to be officially “nonpartisan,” its political criticisms are aimed disproportionately at Republicans. In 2003, for instance, PC launched the website Whitehouseforsale.org, which accuses President Bush of accomplishing “his mission of destroying the presidential public financing system.” Public Citizen has also initiated BushSecrecy.org, which blames the Bush administration for post-9/11 civil liberties violations, lax regulation of allegedly carcinogenic products, cover-ups of auto-safety violations, and inadequate food-inspection standards.
So I think it’s interesting that they’re using my blog as a weapon against Sinclair…I guess anyone who identifies themselves as ‘not a marxist’ is fair game to these moonbats.
