8/25/2004

Get the US out of the UN vote

Filed under: General , NWO @ 6:13 pm

On July 7, the House of Representatives rejected, by an 83 to 335 vote, House Amendment 648, a measure sponsored by Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) “to prohibit the use of funds to pay any United States contribution to the United Nations or any affiliated agency of the United Nations.” In 1997, 54 congressmen voted to get the US out of the UN. And in 1999, 2001 and 2003, 74, 62, and 74 congressmen, respectively, voted to defund US participation in the UN - meaning that, with 83 congressmen voting for the most recent defunding measure, the overall trend against US participation is upward.

On the same day, the House rejected, by a vote of 135-283, House Amendment 644, also sponsored by Rep. Paul, which would have withdrawn US financial support for the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The US rejoined UNESCO in 2002 after leaving, along with Great Britain, in 1984.

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

Kerry–A Secret Service Burden?

Filed under: General , Kerry/Bush Campaign @ 6:12 pm

Do The Math. This is not the only reason to vote against John Forbes Kerry, but it is another good reason to ponder as you make your decision.

What is wrong with this picture?

It is good to be John F. Kerry……. He is the richest Senator in Government. The Kerry’s have five homes in the US, not counting their foreign ones. The cost of the utilities (water, gas & electricity) to run these homes is more than the average American could afford, even if the homes otherwise were free.

•Boston: A five-story, 12-room Beacon Hill town house that serves as Mr. Kerry’s main residence. Assessed value: $6.9 million.

•Nantucket, Mass.: A three-story, five-bedroom waterfront retreat on Brant Point. Assessed value: $9.18 million.

•Washington, D.C.: A 23-room town house in Georgetown. Proposed 2005 assessment: $4.7 million.

•Ketchum, Idaho: A ski getaway converted from a reassembled barn near Sun Valley. Assessed value: $4.9 million. Mrs. Kerry also owns two adjoining lots valued at $1.5 million and $1.8 million.

•Fox Chapel, Pa.: A nine-room colonial on nearly 90 acres in suburban Pittsburgh. The property also includes a nine-room carriage house. Assessed value: $3.7 million.

Consider what the Kerrys invested in those multi-million dollar estates, the maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance, and the staffs, including groundskeepers, building maintenance, and housekeepers. None of these is like the bungalow down the street.

If Kerry is elected President the taxpayers to pay for all that, while he is in office. In addition, we would pay for security improvements for each home, even if they never go to there, just in case. When someone is elected president, the Secret Service has to protect the President, his family and his property. If Kerry is President, we would pay for a Secret Service detail at each home 24 hours per day.

Those details guarding the Presidential home(s) involve - at a minimum, when you consider the Kerrys’ properties - five agents on duty at all times, at each property. They work six-hour shifts, four shifts per day. Some of the Kerry properties may require more guards than that, because they are fairly extensive. After a President leaves office, the taxpayers still have to provide that Secret Security protection, although the former President resumes paying the taxes, maintenance, insurance and all the rest.

If the agents are each paid $60,000 per year, plus another $40,000 per year per agent in benefits, equipment, vehicles, administration, meals, vacations, etc., $100,000 per year per agent could be a low figure. For five homes, that comes to 100 agents, or $10 million per year, for the rest of his life.

The reason the taxpayers provide all this protection is that the President’s salary wouldn’t cover it, even for one home, which is what George and Laura Bush have. Why would anyone with his wealth, want to take the salary of a U.S. Senator, or even the salary of the President? Do you believe him about why he wants to be the President? Do you think he really wants to serve the people? Or for the people serve Him and his wife?

Want more? Come see my followup to this article: “The Flying Squirrel”

http://caoilfhionn.blogspot.com/2004/08/flying-squirrel.html

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

Obama?What a Weenie!Keyes is the man!

Filed under: General , Keyes/Obama @ 6:12 pm



Keyes: Obama’s free ride is over
Remarks on Hannity & Colmes
August 10, 2004

Democrat Barack Obama’s free ride to the Senate is over. That was the essence of remarks by Illinois Senatorial candidate Alan Keyes on Fox News’ Hannity & Colmes, August 9, Monday night.

Asked by co-host Sean Hannity to assess Obama as an opponent, Keyes said,

“Well, I thought, given all the hype, that there was some substance there. Today, however, after saying he wanted six debates, that he’d debate anybody that the Republicans put up, I’m told today he had a press conference, somebody told me now he wants to reduce it to two.”

Continued Keyes,

“He says and claims, and everybody claims, he has such national stature and ability. I step onto the scene, and he’s running for the ropes at the side of the arena.”

Keyes added,

“It seems to me we may have a situation here of all hype and no handle. We’ve got somebody who’s like the Wizard of Oz in the famous picture: big head projected by the media, full of hype, sound, and glory, but when it comes down to it, he doesn’t want to face the test.”

Pressed further, Keyes said:

“Well, the truth of the matter is, if you want to go to the Senate of the United States against the most capable people for presenting and articulating issues, you’d better be prepared for the national arena. And if you’re not prepared for the national arena, you’re not going to be capable of representing the people of Illinois.”

“I have stood in that arena toe-to-toe with the best, and I have shown that I’m not going to run for the sidelines when the goin’ gets tough. I’m going to stand there and make the case for the people of Illinois.”

“He has to prove he can do the same thing.”

At the end of the interview, the show’s other host, Alan Colmes, thanked Dr. Keyes and said,

“We’d also like to note that we invited the Democratic candidate for Senate, Barack Obama, to appear on this program. He declined our invitation.”

Alan Keyes has upset the liberal game plan to crown law school lecturer Barack Obama as the new leader of blacks in America. Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton like Obama because he imitates their votes, but Americans like Keyes because he is straightforward about issues we care about.

The Keyes-Obama race for the U.S. Senate from Illinois reminds locals of a similar contest in 1950. Then a conservative Republican traveled up and down the Land of Lincoln and toppled one of the most powerful liberals of that time, Senate Majority Leader Scott Lucas.The victor in that race, Everett McKinley Dirksen, played to the grassroots rather than to the media. His stunning upset showed that the voters were ready to break with New Deal liberalism and join the Republican landslide in 1952. Everett Dirksen, the greatest orator of his time, won because he articulated public opposition to the follies of the Truman Administration. Dirksen was equally persuasive whether he was negotiating with a small group over an arcane section of legislation or declaiming broad themes without a microphone to a thousand voters on the hillsides of southern Illinois.

Illinois voters have the opportunity this year to hear Alan Keyes, perhaps the greatest orator of our time and a man with a fund of knowledge about issues that matches his eloquence. His biggest obstacle is not that he is not an Illinoisan, not that he is black, but that the media have already anointed Obama as the winner after viciously destroying his other opponents.

Obama had demanded six debates with his Republican opponent when he was Jack Ryan, a businessman unaccustomed to political argument. Reminding us of history’s famous Lincoln-Douglas debates, Obama confidently said the people of Illinois are owed these debates because they deserve more than packaged television ads and rehearsed sound bites. Now that Keyes has replaced Ryan as the Republican nominee, Obama wants only two or three debates. Did the history of the Lincoln-Douglas debates change between Ryan’s resignation and Keyes’s nomination?

The media were touting Obama’s Harvard degree, but Keyes’s Harvard Ph.D. is more accomplished than Obama’s law degree. Besides, we already have too many liberal lawyers such as Kerry and Edwards running the Democratic Party for the benefit of the trial lawyers.

Alan Keyes is a walking encyclopedia on a wide variety of subjects including the Constitution, the proper role of government, and foreign policy. He was an ambassador to the United Nations during the Reagan Administration, and we can count on him to address the important issues that were conspicuously missing from Obama’s speech to the Democratic National Convention.

Obama is one of the most leftwing Senate candidates Illinois has ever seen, a me-too vote for Kennedy and Clinton to raise taxes and toady to the teachers unions. Obama supports abortion rights, socialized medicine, and affirmative action, and he opposes private gun ownership. Obama voted against the “live-birth abortion” bill which was designed to protect live babies born of botched abortions. Obama voted “present” on an Illinois bill to ban partial-birth abortion, and “present” on a bill to notify parents when their minor children seek an abortion.

Obama wrote a letter to the Windy City Times, Chicago’s premier gay news source, to promise his support for gay marriage. He said, “I opposed DOMA [the Defense of Marriage Act] in 1996. It should be repealed and I will vote for its repeal on the Senate floor. I will also oppose any proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution to ban gays and lesbians from marrying.”

Alan Keyes, on the other hand, is the country’s most eloquent defender of the right to life. He is supremely ready to tackle the cultural issues that will be the key to victory in the 2004 elections — abortion, traditional marriage, parental control over education, and supremacist judges inventing “rights” such as abortion, sodomy, same-sex marriage licenses, and sending pornography into your kids’ computers.

Bill Cosby recently made headlines by decrying the decline in education for African-Americans. Keyes is ready to take on the teachers unions and hold them accountable for failing to teach youngsters how to read.The Bush-haters rally behind Obama, not because his father was African, but because he can be counted on to protect the teachers unions, abortion, and gay unions.

The Democrats had hoped to elect Obama by simply playing the race card, but the nomination of Alan Keyes has checkmated that strategy.Obama’s campaign contributors tell you what you need to know about his liberalism. His donors include George Soros, Hillary Clinton’s Leadership PAC, People for the American Way, Planned Parenthood, the National Abortion Rights League, the National Education Association, the American Federation of Teachers, and Progressive Choices.

Alan Keyes has exposed the lie that the Democrats are the party for advancing minorities. Those who want a leader, regardless of race, who will speak up for traditional values such as marriage, life, and education choice, will vote for Alan Keyes.

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.