See it here also at Freedom Folks. See Michelle get attacked at about 4:30 start it at 3:30 to see the identity of the attacker. What a surprise, the LGBT was there!!!
they will be on blog talk radio with me next Sunday at 3:00 CST for one hour.
It’s due time the truth comes out of the closet: we are all born straight - male bodies have male sex organs, females have female sex organs. They are complimentary sexual parts; they are a heterosexual design. By design, male sex organs are designed to fit the sex organs of females.
Ryan Sorba’s campus campaign (the Conservative Revolution)
Ryan Sorba, Part II
Ryan Sorba, Part III
Ryan Sorba’s book is called “The Born Gay Hoax”
And I can’t find a link to it, but will update this post when I have it.
These spoofs are getting more and more amusing…
From the last of the few.
Obama’s mysterious “Frank” who served as his mentor, according to his book “Dreams of My Father”, is in reality, Frank Marshall Davis, a member of the old Moscow-controlled Communist Party USA.
Obama’s Red Mentor Praised Red Army is an AIM (Accuracy In the Media) report. The poetry written by Frank attacks traditional Christianity and the work of Christian missionaries and hails the Soviet Union’s Red Army, with a call to “Smash on, victory-eating Red Army.”
Kincaid from AIM said in a statement on his USA Survival organization website, that a full report will be released May 22 on how communist and socialist forces have influenced Obama.
“Herbert Romerstein, a former investigator for the House Committee on Un-American Activities, will present a detailed report on Obama’s years in Hawaii, when he came into contact with and under the influence of a member of the Communist Party, Frank Marshall Davis,” Kincaid said.
He also will detail “Obama’s years in Chicago, when he came into contact with and under the influence of communists, socialists, and even communist terrorists. There is a very disturbing pattern here … It can be no accident that Obama always seems to gravitate to the most extreme, anti-American forces. If you think Rev. [Jeremiah] Wright [Obama’s pastor] is something, wait until you see the information that we have developed.”
Wow, I can’t wait to read about it.
See here. and here. this information is here.
Description: Rally followed by march to Daley Plaza
Noon to 5pm, Free
Federal Plaza Square
219 S Dearborn
(847)341-0591
Date: Saturday, May 3, 2008
Time: 12:00pm
Priority: Medium
Created by: Chicago Events Calendar
Updated: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 1:14pm
Dr. Robert L. DuPont, president of the Institute for Behavior and Health and former director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse:
Legalization of marijuana would solve the marijuana problem the way legalizing speeding would solve the speeding problem: it would remove the legal inhibition of a dangerous behavior, and thereby encourage the behavior.
Criticism of current marijuana policy typically starts by limiting the calculation of marijuana’s societal costs to the costs of arresting and imprisoning marijuana users. This way of calculating the costs minimizes those produced by use of the drug itself (i.e., the costs of treatment, drugged driving crashes, and lost productivity). When the costs related to the use of marijuana are minimized, the legalization of marijuana gives the appearance of reducing marijuana-related social costs in the same way that counting only the costs of enforcing the speeding laws and ignoring the high social costs of speeding would make legalizing speeding look like a smart idea.
Just as many people who speed do not have accidents, many people who smoke marijuana do not have problems as a result of their use, especially those who use the drug for brief periods of time and/or infrequently. The same is true for drunk driving — it is estimated that the drunk driver’s risk of an accident is about one in 2,000 episodes of drunk driving. Nevertheless, speeding and drunk driving are punishable by law because of the serious consequences of these behaviors. In all of these cases, legal prohibition serves as a reasonably effective deterrent to the behavior. For those who are undeterred by prohibition, the enforcement of the law produces escalating consequences for repeated violations.
Today in the U.S., the criminal penalties for marijuana use are mild, far more so than for speeding and drunk driving, and are usually limited to the payment of a small fine. The few people now in prison solely for marijuana use have almost all been charged with more serious offenses, and then pleaded guilty to this lesser offense.
The most remarkable aspect of the debate on marijuana legalization is the failure of legalization advocates to define the precise nature of legalization. Is marijuana to be prescribed by doctors, and dispensed by pharmacies like a medicine? If so, for what purpose, and at what dose? Doctors are not in the habit of negotiating with drug users over which drugs they would like to use for recreational purposes, and how much of the drugs they want. Does legalization of marijuana mean its sale to any willing buyer should be legal? What about the sale of legal marijuana to youth? We have not done a good job of keeping alcohol and cigarettes out of the hands of young people. There is a simple reason that it is rare to hear a description of the mechanics of marijuana legalization: all of the ways marijuana can be made legal are either ridiculous, or frightening, or both. In addition, the U.S. has international treaty obligations not to legalize marijuana, or any other illegal drug, for non-medical use.
As a public health physician, I am convinced that keeping marijuana illegal — messy as this sometimes appears to be — is in the public interest. Legalization of marijuana would lead to more marijuana use, and undermine the current prevention efforts which are reinforced by the force of law. Because more marijuana use means more marijuana-caused problems, removing legal prohibition against marijuana use would have adverse effects on the public health.
I’d love to see the people marching in this ‘global march’ today in downtown Chicago!!!
Help Stop George Soros Drug Legalizing Machine from the Soros Monitor
Why Does George Soros Want To Legalize Drugs?
His stated reasons are so bizarre they are not credible. But actions speak louder than words.
To the detriment of our society, and the entire free world, Soros contributes vast sums of money to organizations that attempt to legalize and proliferate the use of illicit drugs by corrupting politicians and promoting false information.
The millions he gives to organizations like the Drug Policy Alliance are in part used for political contributions to affect legislation that would keep the avenues open to expand the use of illicit drugs by children, where almost all addiction begins.
Soros: Described by the New York Times as “The world’s single largest donor” (Dec. 17,1996) While others give to the arts and higher education or to better the quality of the lives of their fellow men. Soros funds campaigns to legalize illegal drugs.”
Soros and his companions Peter Lewis and John Sperling have collectively invested close to $100 million to legalize and proliferate the use of illicit drugs, just in America. But they are also spending vast sums to influence politicians from Boston to Sacramento, and Stockholm to Sydney. The infiltration of corrupt legislation is deep, and if not held in check, will become irreversible.
Subscribe in a reader
Stock 20: Royalty Free Music for Media Professionals
