You can listen here. I just went back and listened; it looks like there are no archives up, which is utterly weird. This sounds like the show from the other day. If you go to Dollard’s profile page, it says ‘no shows are scheduled’.
On November 13, 2002, Mary Stachowicz offered Nicholas Gutierrez God’s love and forgiveness, and on November 13, Nicholas Gutierrez punched, kicked, and mutilated Mary Stachowicz with a knife until he got tired. Then he placed a garbage bag over her head, strangled her, and jammed her body in a crawl space under the floor of his apartment.
Gutierrez confessed to the crime and was charged with first-degree murder, attempting to conceal a homicide, and burglary.
On July 2, 2007 AD Nicholas Gutierrez was spared the death penalty and sentanced to life in prison in the rape and murder of onetime co-worker Mary Stachowicz, 51, mother of four.
It is commonly believed that Nicholas Gutierrez was spared the death penalty because he is gay and Mary Stachowicz was a Christian.
Mary Stachowicz paid with her life for sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ and having the nerve to ask why Nicholas Gutierrez had sex with men rather than women.
Stachowicz’s trying to get him to change his sexuality reminded him of his mother. “She had this sneer, which reminded me of my mother when she used to beat me…I saw nothing but red,” Gutierrez was reported saying in the Chicago Sun-Times.
I see deeper psychological problems here!!! Here’s a guy who hates his mother, has chosen not to get involved with women, and symbolically killed his mother when he murdered Stachowicz. This is something akin to “psycho”.
So it would appear as though SOME gays do not take those who disagree with them lightly; they don’t want to hear the truth.
Shouldn’t Christians be afraid? I should say that activists have played the victim card long enough!
If homosexuality is about “love”, why don’t they act lovingly towards others and practice the tolerance they criticize others for not having? Why can’t they accept people who don’t agree with them?
When the victim is Politically Correct, the media cooperates with activist groups to use the tragedy to promote the desired “progressive” end–in the case of Shepard’s murder, homosexual-inclusive “hate crimes” legislation.
When the murder victim is not Politically Correct–such as Mary Stachowicz, a devout Catholic woman brutally beaten and stabbed to death by an enraged homosexual–what we get is media disinterest and silence.
Chicago Public Defender Blames Mary Stachowicz for Her Own Murder - that is appalling.
Mikey’s tent of reality on a few stories from the UK:
Two men have been jailed “for life” for the murder of a homosexual bar man, Jody Dobrowski. They will each serve a minimum of 28 years in prison. It is believed to be the first time that a judge has been able to use an anti-gay motive as an aggravating feature to help decide the sentence.
So what message does this send out? Firstly, it’s a beastly crime - if it’s a life sentence, shouldn’t life mean life? But it also suggests that a homosexual life is more important than a heterosexual one. So, if you’re going to murder someone, you’d better make sure that your victim is straight - otherwise you’d get a harsher punishment.
And it looks even more twisted when you consider that a paedophile rapist, also convicted “for life”, may serve a minimum sentence of just 5 years.
Tells you all you need to know about the warped priorities of those who make the law.
“Christians are having their freedom of speech and worship taken away by hate-speech laws designed to protect homosexuals from having their feelings hurt.”-Richard Dreher at NRO
The first half hour, On Wolves, Sheep and Sheepdogs and the second half, Stacy Harp from Active Christian Media on the Homosexual Agenda, Sally Kern, and resources on the subject.
Joe Brummer might find the “On Wolves, Sheep and Sheepdogs” essay rather interesting, considering he prefers to be a sheep.
Crescent controversy on Fox News television and Fox News front page! Thanks to the Avid Editor for the video clips
Boy, Murdoch is pulling out all the stops saying that ‘what continues to grow is support for the design’!!! What continues to grow is the OPPOSITION to planting the biggest Mosque in North America by a factor of 100 on the Flight93 crash site and the graves of the passenger and crew to commemmorate tha 9/11 terrorists.
What Murdoch is doing is in complete violation of Congress’s mandate that says the terrorists were excluded from the definition of passengers and crew and are not to be honored in the memorial.
Check out the Fox News front page today, where “Crescent Outrage” alternates top billing with “Six-Legged Soldiers!” Finally, more than a handful of Americans will at least know that there is a controversy over the Flight 93 memorial.
They won’t know much more than that. The Fox reporting is pretty bare, and includes no mention of the Mecca orientation of the giant crescent, no mention of the 44 inscribed translucent blocks on the flight path, no mention of the Islamic sundial, and no fact checking (the modern media disease). Still, this is big.
Fox IS airing the side-by-side comparison of the Crescent of Embrace and the Islamic crescent. They also report Tom Burnett’s condemnation of the crescent design an insult to his murdered son, and they mention our petition.
Fox has a lot more information at their disposal. They had a television crew to the Somerset County Courthouse yesterday where Colonel Harry Beam laid out a precise and devastating exposé of Islamic and terrorist memorializing design features, and they were sent extensive fact checking materials. None of this gets into their present reporting. Hopefully they will be using this material for an investigative feature in the not-too-distant future.
It appears as though CBS has something on this, also–
Welcome Larry Sinclair readers!!!!
First, what the hell is George Soros-funded, Ralph Nader’s Public Citizen Litigation Group doing supporting Larry Sinclair’s detractors? The court filings representing mzmolly, TubeSockTedD, OWNINGLIARS and the Democratic Underground were put together by Public Citizen Litigation Group. I find this incredibly interesting. Public Citizen’s involvement shows that it is going to bat for the Obama campaign…and it’s not surprising, considering that Ted Kennedy and a bunch of democrats endorse it. To my knowledge, however, its purpose was not to defend citizens from litigation - it was to go after corporations. The last I knew, Larry Sinclair isn’t a corporation.
[Public Citizen] claims to represent the interests of American consumers by fighting “for openness and democratic accountability in government; for the right of consumers to seek redress in the courts; for clean, safe and sustainable energy sources; for social and economic justice in trade policies; for strong health, safety and environmental protections; and for safe, effective and affordable prescription drugs and health care.” The means by which PC generally believes these goals can be achieved is increased government intervention and litigation against corporations — a practice founded on the premise that American corporations, like the capitalist system of which they are a part, are inherently inclined toward corruption.
They don’t, of course, take any responsibility for their being corrupt themselves.
Litigation Group: Litigating at all levels of the federal and state judiciaries, this division of Public Citizen “specializes in cases involving health and safety regulation, consumer rights, access to the courts, open government, and the First Amendment, including Internet free speech.”
Well, we can strike out health and safety regulation (because they’re the ones making death threats against Larry Sinclair; if anyone has a fear about his health and safety it’s Sinclair), consumer rights, access to the courts and open government. I guess it falls under the heading of First Amendment, including internet free speech. I guess they consider “internet free speech” such that you can tell lies and defame people under stupid pseudonyms.
It’s a “consumer rights” organization. It’s interesting to me that the Democratic Underground is consider a “consumer” here. Not that that particular side of the aisle is interesting in abiding by its own rules or that of the court, anyway…they make them up as they go along!
These people have terrorized Sinclair, called him a mental patient, and a bunch of other lies - I think they should be held responsible for it.
They object to having their star, the shifty messiah, to be forced to show up in court to answer the allegations; but seeing how artful the campaign has been to skirt the issue, I don’t see that there’s any other way to even get through to Obama or his campaign -or Axelrod, since they don’t return phone calls, and they don’t behave like human beings, or act like they need to answer to anyone. That leads me to believe it will be much the same if Obama becomes president…he thinks he knows what’s best for the rest of us, just like the moonbats at the DU, and the marxists blogging for Obama who try to generate the most flattering propaganda for the knuckledragging masses who are treating him more like a rock star than a candidate for president.
If the fact that I’m not a “marxist” makes me “right wing”, then so be it, I’ll gladly take the hit for that distinction.
The expensive lawyers who’ve magically appeared in the court proceedings in the Larry Sinclair saga have featured this blog and the comments that Larry has made here, taking his comments out of context in order to prolong this thing. Also, my blog talk radio show has become somewhat of a hit in those filings, too.
What is concerning me is their tactic of trumping up hundreds of pages of lies that have to be answered by Larry’s attorney. Larry’s attorney is only one guy - and what he’s up against is legions of the National Lawyers Guild (commie) genre. They are betting that Larry’s limited resources will help them win in the end, rather than the truth.
The ‘other side’ has revealed Larry’s social security number and other information that was not required by the court, in order to purposely put his safety even further at risk.
They continue to break the law!!!
They complain that Larry is using the courts in order for the truth to come out, and use that as the reasoning for the truth not to come out.
Larry and his lawyer need all the support we can lend them. To me this is a classic modern day David and Goliath story!!
Kudos to Larry for hanging in there!
Though Public Citizen claims to be officially “nonpartisan,” its political criticisms are aimed disproportionately at Republicans. In 2003, for instance, PC launched the website Whitehouseforsale.org, which accuses President Bush of accomplishing “his mission of destroying the presidential public financing system.” Public Citizen has also initiated BushSecrecy.org, which blames the Bush administration for post-9/11 civil liberties violations, lax regulation of allegedly carcinogenic products, cover-ups of auto-safety violations, and inadequate food-inspection standards.
So I think it’s interesting that they’re using my blog as a weapon against Sinclair…I guess anyone who identifies themselves as ‘not a marxist’ is fair game to these moonbats.
A prayer for Jack Idema from Fahim:
You fought for the people who were left so behind..You fought for the women who were treated like slaves…You fought for the children who were sexually attacked….You fought for a country and freed it as well…You fought for America to stop the terror…I will pray for you Jack, with my every breath…You are a hero and will be always.
It is customary on Sundays for me to offer up a prayer for Jack and Brent and that they’re both able to return home to the United States safely and without repurcussions from our government for doing the job they were sent to do…
If they’re not appreciated by our own government, it is good to know that Afghanistanis appreciate them for what they did and how they sacrificed for the people and women of Afghanistan.
Trackback with one of your posts that you think deserves some special attention from this past week.
Watch for Open Trackbacks here on Fridays, Sundays and Wednesdays.
Here is the trackback link to this post:
http://caosblog.com/7773/trackback/
To trackback to any post just use the post slug or “permalink” and add trackback/ to the end of it.
One other thing.
I will be deleting trackbacks when the posts don’t show that you’ve linked here. Make sure you do as I did, below–either saying thanks to Cao’s blog and linking to this post, or mention that I have a trackback party, and link to this post. Otherwise the trackback will be deleted.
If you are unable to send trackbacks, then use the Wizbang Standalone Trackback Pinger.
Others holding trackback parties:
Add this Blogroll to your site
Subscribe in a reader
want this on your blog?
