Plan your trip to the Flight 93 crash site for the weekend of August 2nd!

Are you thinking of visiting the Flight 93 crash site? If you plan your visit for the weekend of August 2nd, you can help stop the gigantic terrorist memorial mosque that will soon start rising from the ground there.

August 2nd is the next scheduled public meeting of the Memorial Project, where anyone can sign up to speak during the public comment period. Tom Burnett Sr. (whose son Tom Jr. broke into the cockpit of the hijacked airplane) announced last Friday that he and Alec Rawls will be traveling to Somerset for the August meeting. They will be rallying outdoors, speaking at the public meeting, and visiting the crash site.

Mr. Burnett is asking other concerned parties who can make it to please come. The crash site is a beautiful and meaningful place to visit in any case, and here is a chance to make your visit even more meaningful. It is an opportunity to in some small way follow the lead of the heroes of Flight 93 by helping to stop the re-hijacking of Flight 93.

Mr. Burnett’s announcement came on the Mancow Muller radio show, where Congressman Tancredo was also a guest. When controversy over the Crescent of Embrace design first arose back in 2005, Tom Tancredo was instrumental in forcing the Park Service to alter the design. Last fall he noted that the giant crescent remains unchanged in the so-called redesign and asked the Park Service to scrap the design entirely. On Friday he said that he would help Mancow Muller and Tom Burnett to stop the crescent design (audio, 19 seconds):

Certainly I will do everything I can to help you. I will bring it to the attention of my colleagues. I’ll use the time I have on the floor of the House to rail against it.

THANK YOU CONGRESSMAN TANCREDO!

Mr. Burnett said that he would join Mancow in going to jail for taking sledgehammers to the crescent memorial if this tribute to the terrorists actually gets built. (Audio, 25 seconds.)

Cao has the whole segment of Mancow and the two Toms up as a YouTube video, with her own background graphics.

To join our blogbursts, just send your blog’s url.

The Mitch Squad took their harassment and abuse from the internet to email this morning.

I will reiterate:

STOP EMAILING ME.

I will not communicate with harassing cyberstalkers who intentionally endanger the lives of those I love and everyone around me by ILLEGALLY spreading my personal and confidential information and UNLISTED PHONE NUMBER. If you expect me to be civil, then you should be; take it down. Okay, you got my attention, but you don’t have my cooperation. Take it down.

Why is the phone number unlisted? Because of a stalking incident when my children were small. And guess what, we caught that MF, too. And guess what, I am entitled to protect my own safety and that of everyone else around me: This is aimed directly at my life, and the lives of the people close to me, AND PEOPLE I DON’T EVEN KNOW!!!!

If anything happens to any of the people on that list, I will hold you personally responsible.

TAKE THAT POST DOWN.

The Cyberstalker’s Motivation

Four major themes surrounding the cyberstalking relationship emerged from the data. They were the ‘vindictive’, ‘composed’, ‘collective’, and ‘intimate’ cyberstalkers.

The Vindictive Cyberstalker

This group is so named due to the ferocity to which they victimise those whom they pursue. They threatened their victims more than any other group and in the majority of cases they actually stalked their target offline. A third of the perpetrators were known to have had a previous criminal record, and two-thirds were known to have victimised others before.

The Mitch Squad has already established themselves in this category with threats directed at Larry Sinclair, and now me. Who else is there? From what I gather, they’ve promised to do this to whoever supports Larry Sinclair. But they also seem to be playing out of a sick cyberstalking terrorizing handbook:

Harassment would be used to discredit the victim and/or silence the victim. In this group, identity theft was used to impersonate and discredit victims. Group cyberstalking was also observed in the study. Here two or more perpetrators perceived that they had been ‘wronged’ and wished to ‘punish’ the victim. It was not beyond this group of cyberstalkers to try and recruit others to harass the victim offline. In one case, one group of perpetrators were able to enlist other perpetrators to harass their target offline by giving them the victim’s address.

WOW, just like the Smear Jack Cabal!!! Does Cafasso teach classes in this at Ruckus training camp or something? Am I experiencing deja vu, or what.

I’m going to start a blogroll for bloggers against internet stalking. If you want to jump on, send me your url at caoilfhionn1 at gmail dot com. We should band together and stand up to idiots like this who think they can use blackmail and intimidation to control the content you write about.

Previous: here and here.

I’m not dumb enough to broadcast what I’m going to do about this to this bunch of screaming hyenas, but believe you me, I’m not sitting still for it.

When seeing that the ‘majority of Californians’ support gay marriage in the news the other day, I was reminded of the story reported in the Telegraph about a gay couple who abused four young boys in their charge. (Van Helsing)

No “majority” supports gay marriage; I don’t even consider California a part of the US at times, considering how far off the charts leftist they are (particularly Bezerkeley, the west coast vortex of extremely blind moonbattery). California was also responsible, under Ronald Reagan, to kick off ‘no fault divorce’, which rippled across the country and caused innumerable broken families because of how easy it eventually became to divorce someone. Just like attacking military recruitment isn’t something to brag about, ‘the majority of Californians support gay marriage’ is not something to be particularly proud of, either.

I say this because of its implications….it’s the same kind of idiocy that will get more children hurt.

Remember the story Joshua Brown and Davis Carpenter, a homosexual couple who brutally sodomized and tortured 13-year-old Jesse Dirkhising to death? See also, Free to Rape Again.

Investigators have discovered that by the time sex criminals reach adulthood most have committed an extensive member of offenses that are never reported. Psychologist Philip Humbert of Eugene Oregon, was treating eight sex criminals charge with 16 offenses in all and convicted of 12. The eight admitted to over 13,000 deviant acts, including molestation and rape.

When the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit in Quantico, Virginia, research the backgrounds of incarcerated serial rapist, they found that 41 of them were responsible for at least 837 rapes and over 400 more attempts. In a study funded by the National Institute of Mental Health, Emory University psychiatrist Gene G. Able found that 453 criminals admitted to molesting more than 67,000 children. Those who abused girls had an average of 52 victims each. But men who molested boys had an astonishing average of 150 victims.

Now not all homosexuals commit these acts against children; but we should be wary of trusting them ALL for fear of “offending” a ‘protected class’. The numbers indicate we should be very concerned about this!!!

And guess what? “Fear of Prejudice” let gay carers abuse boys

A council’s political correctness allowed a pair of homosexual foster parents to sexually abuse children in their care, a report has concluded.

Managers and social workers were reluctant to investigate Craig Faunch and Ian Wathey for fear of being accused of prejudice.

Instead, they were viewed as “trophy carers” who, by virtue of their sexuality, had a “badge” which made their actions less questionable.

A mother of eight-year-old twins raised concerns about them with social services after finding a photograph of one of the boys using the lavatory.

But the authorities took no action, accepting that the two men had been “naive and silly”.

That’s the same exact mentality that will sweep the nation after California’s stupidity regarding this important issue.

There is no “majority” that supports “gay marriage”. There is no such thing as “gay marriage” - gays can’t produce children, and there are a number of stories about child abuse that indicates we should be very wary about gay couples who want to ‘adopt’ or ‘foster’ children.

What is appalling is this:

The victims were among 18 children placed with the pair, Yorkshire’s first homosexual foster parents, between August 2003 and January 2005.

Gay activists might be proclaiming California’s gay marriage business as a victory, but we should all be wary of what ‘change’ this will mean for us in the future.

I just saw a forensics program by Michael Baden, the forensics expert. The show was about autopsy evidence that unequivocally concluded that the death was due to his first responder action on 9/11 and breathing in the particles from the aftermath of the buildings falling down.

There are-right now- 12,000 first responders who are now suffering with 9/11 lung-related injuries. Over 800 police officers and firefighters have taken disability due to their first responder action on 9/11. Part of this was they rushed in to help and weren’t properly protected or trained for a situation like that.

Soon there will be many more than 3,000 victims of 9/11.

On top of all that are the incredible heroic rescue dogs that died as a result.

The show is mentioned here.

On Friday, former Illinois National Guard Sergeant Garrett Anderson appeared in a television advertisement on behalf of Vets for Freedom PAC, an organization committed to winning the war on terror. On Sunday, Senator Dick Durbin responded to the advertisement on CBS News by attacking both the organization and Sergeant Anderson with outright falsehoods that need to be corrected.

Senator Dick Durbin falsely claimed that Senator Obama was instrumental in aiding Sergeant Anderson with his VA claim for disability injuries.

Sergeant Anderson wants to correct the record,

“Senator Obama did not respond to my letters or offer his assistance until after my claim had been successfully resolved…and Senator Durbin should know this, because it was through his own staff that I was finally able to receive my benefits.”

This was a completely unnecessary lie to prop the Obama campaign…

Source

These posters are telling us all we need to know about the two “democrat” candidates. Hillary and Obama’s communist-style propaganda posters dispel any doubt. What is interesting, though, is how they’re not selling it by its brand name yet, although at least Obama’s young followers are not ashamed about their radical political ideology, demonstrated by their flying communist flags and pictures of Che, and even the Decemberists, the opening act for Obama during his visit to Oregon, that is famous for playing the now-defunct Soviet Union’s national anthem, celebrating communism. Communism is definitely still alive, and it’s living and multiplying among us.

How much longer can our nation hold on to the principles of capitalism and freedom that it was founded on??? Not much longer if either a Republican or a Democrat are elected, when you look at the three stooges candidates that stand before us. Each one is a victim in his own right, and the only difference between McCain and the other two are their position on the war, which the American people rank very low right now on their list of priorities in this election cycle. What’s a shame is I think that is driven by the media. The media has dropped their interest in Iraq, since all they want to report are IVAW-style stories of American committing atrocities and stories which give them the excuse to beat on the Abu Ghraib story.

Clinton’s followers at least on the surface, appear to be more careful than Obama’s. Is it because she’s not appealing to those who prefer to portray themselves as disenfranchised victims of capitalist America as much as Obama’s are? Fairey’s Obama campaign poster is in the style of a Lenin or Che posters, while Hillary’s new poster is more like those of Chairman Mao.

Previous post including Fairey’s communist “art” here. Fairey’s problem with plagiarism here at Mark Vallen’s Art For a Change website. The plagiarism article has come under attack by the Obamanots; but as we’ve seen, you can’t disparage their candidate in any way without falling under personal attack. Name-calling is a typical response from these loons.

If you don’t like the message, kill the messenger.

Here are some more Obey posters:

To my knowledge, Hillary’s campaign poster was not created by Shephard Fairey. Fairey’s Obama poster came out in a limited edition of 350 prints, while Hillary’s is available for $40.00.

While they seek to destroy capitalism, they sure do take advantage of it.

Trackback with one of your posts that you think deserves some special attention from this past week.

Watch for Open Trackbacks here on Fridays, Sundays and Wednesdays.

Here is the trackback link to this post:

http://caosblog.com/7877/trackback/

To trackback to any post just use the post slug or “permalink” and add trackback/ to the end of it.

One other thing.

I will be deleting trackbacks when the posts don’t show that you’ve linked here. Make sure you do as I did, below–either saying thanks to Cao’s blog and linking to this post, or mention that I have a trackback party, and link to this post. Otherwise the trackback will be deleted.

If you are unable to send trackbacks, then use the Wizbang Standalone Trackback Pinger.

Others holding trackback parties:

Add this Blogroll to your site