The Mitch and Nan Show have a dot com address now. Imagine that. Now we’ll have to investigate the TOS of their hosting company….which is godaddy. It was registered with domains by proxy out of Scotsdale, AZ.
While they claim that Sinclair hasn’t proven anything, that’s because few if any have bothered to follow the facts that he presented at the National Press Club which you can see here at LarrySinclair.org
Roger (talkstar radio host) [right click here and download it to your desktop - the link is from hbeeinc] said it very clearly when he had “Mitch” on the radio the other day…who cares? Mitch alleges a lot of things he can’t prove, but the bottom line to what Roger was saying in rebuttal is…’why do you care?’ I’d certainly like to know; Sinclair isn’t running for POTUS, but Obama’s background, affiliations and supporters should be intesnsely scrutinized because HE IS running for POTUS (as Larry has maintaned from the start); and as Obama himself has acknowledged, a different set of standards are applied to presidential candidates - as well they should be.
Interestingly enough, you do a search for Roger’s mitch interview on google, using various search terms which SHOULD bring it up, and nothing comes up.
It’s incredible that google would be so blatant in its scrubbing of certain search terms in order to coverup certain things that are going on that I think people should have an opportunity to see/listen to/be exposed to in order to make up their own minds.
When doing a search for roger talkstar mitch and nan show larry sinclair, strictly anti-Sinclair hysteria shows up, and none of the support.
The Goebbels style propagandists appear to be afraid for Obama about certain things getting out; which is why they’ve set up this incredible propaganda event in Denver, reminiscent of the blind lemming Hitler acolytes at huge rallies in the 30’s. It is one of the reasons that someone artfully put together a video of Hitler lip synching to ‘movin’ on up’.
Denver will be similar, only with Obama at the podium, although–there will also be the rockstar element, which will satiate the younger crowd of fainting lemmings.
As has been pointed out elsewhere, they think he’s a Rockstar for simply showing up to work. They can’t come up with any accomplishments - other than he’s the first black presidential candidate - and even that is a lie - his ‘black’ african roots come from arab slave traders which is why the three muslim names–which is also why Jesse Jackson recently complained that Obama was ‘talking down to black people’ when his mic was still live and whispered that he’d like to cut his nuts off.
Even people who you’d think should be supporting him are publicly embarassing themselves with their disgust.
The Mitch and Nan Show i- if anybody is bothering to go over there, still contains posts of ridicule that bear little relevance - except for the fact that they’ve propelled Larry’s story further into the public’s awareness.
Which I’m sure wasn’t their original intention, although I’m certain that Covington - at least until he was exposed as a larcenist and fraud for his own part, at one time enjoyed his star status, if for not any other reason that he fit in very well with the pathological liars who feel their own behavior is above reproach.
Why did Roger devote some time to this story? BECAUSE NOW IT’S A STORY AND HAS LEGS!
Thanks to the obamatards and some of the Ron Paul supporters such as Mitch Covington for giving the Sinclair story legs. The fight the smears site hasn’t dignified it with a response, which in my mind raises more questions.
I found it interesting that Mitch didn’t turn the phone over to Scott so you could tell they were definitely not the same person…and that the french blogger and Mitch both are Ron Paul supporters; ideologically they could be the same person. And that’s not all. Mitch’s accent wasn’t consistent, either…and reminded me of the fellow on youtube who was imitating inspector Clouseau.
Mitch didn’t use any phrases in the french language, or phrase his sentences in English as if he was thinking in french-he didn’t use any french jokes and try to translate them to English-and therefore he was not very convincing–even taking a cheap shot at the end, saying ‘whenever Larry opens his mouth it’s a lie’.
And that phrase itself shows you how desperate these people are, because every time they try to slap him down, he surprises them and gets back up and comes up with a new piece of information about his detractors. The more Larry fights on, the more hysterical they get, so it’s become entertaining to see the newest tidbits they’ve manufactured.
For example, they’re running a contest to make up what disguise Sinclair is going to wear at the huge event in Denver that the Obama campaign sent an email to sell raffle tickets for. You will get paid airfare and a photo op with him backstage !!!- as if he’s some kind of a rockstar instead of a political candidate. Lame Cherry pointed out that it was Larry that broke that story
Mr. Sinclair has been quite amusing as he broke the story of the Obama camp raffling off tickets to the stadium event which is illegal in over 30 of the United States. He deserves full credit on this as a journalist as World Net Daily and the Minneapolis Star Tribune are examining the criminality now as Obama people yawn over it.
- not only was it picked up by WorldnetDaily and the Minneapolis Star Tribune, but Rocky Mountain News and even disenfranchised Obama supporters.
The article that Sinclair talks about in this post is a case in point.
The hotel wasn’t paid for with ‘money orders’, it was paid for with a visa card. I’ve never heard of a hotel accepting money orders!
The other two weeks I stayed at the Rodeway Inn while working with Texas and Delaware officials to transfer my housing from Texas to Delaware was infact paid by a housing Voucher issued through the DELAWARR SSC (Social Service Center) 500 Rogers Rd, New Castle, DE. All of this is known to Delaware officials and to Delaware Prosecutors so to imply otherwise and to mislead as the News Journal has done is beyond reckless. I believe this demonstrates that the News Journal has published out right lies.
It’s interesting that “news” outfits are relying on these people for their ’scoops’; it’s obvious they don’t give a damn about ‘facts’ - they are interested in any tidbit that fits their political message.
The grand jury proceedings is another questionable endeavor these people have pushed; no time in history has a grand jury been called on charges such as these.
But the reason they did so, Larry contends, is so that there would be no preliminary hearing - which would have seen the charges dismissed.
They are pulling a lot of weird political maneuvers and yanking the legal system around as if they own it - regardless as to what the rules are.
Sinclair shouldn’t tip his hand about what else he has that make the grand jury thing so ridiculous, unfounded and unjustified, but rest assured he has that and more.
As far as the “innocent three bloggers” are concerned, their identities have been posited on the internet already…by themselves.
OWNINGLIARS, TubesockTedD and mzmolly have already outted themselves without any help from any court proceedings, although it would have been nice if the judge had allowed those proceedings to move forward.
It’s interesting how the system seems to be protecting the attackers of Larry Sinclair. It’s also interesting that Public Citizen is defending them, so they don’t need to raise any money. Lawyers cost a lot of money, which is one reason why a few bloggers have brought up the idea - that if we’re going to have national health care, we should have a national legal defense fund - so that everyone can get legal representation without losing their shirt in legal fees.
That’s another contention of the Mitch and Nan Show…that Larry is in it for the money, and that he’s made over $60,000. For the first part, I think that’s ridiculous. And for the second part, it would seem they’ve pulled that magical number out of thin air without any proof.
What I find interesting is that the search terms for those three bloggers shows up nothing on google.
But we can add that to the rest of the mysterious forces that are helping the lies of this group of people who all know each other…
And add the money order thing, their supposedly being fed information by state prosecutors, and the lies about what it is in the court file to the rest of their idiotic charges against Sinclair as reason not to simply drop the sex and drugs in the back of a limo story from 1999 - and don’t expect Obama to answer them, and don’t expect him to publicly retract his claims about when he stopped using drugs, and don’t expect him to acknowledge that he’s bought coke, used it, and done other untoward things while he was a State Senator.
More and more people have uncovered the truth about Obama, and they fit in line with what Sinclair has been saying since September of 2007 - and publicly since January of 2008 after Donald Young’s murder.
They sure do seem to be wasting a lot of time making up fictitious scenarios and lies, backed up by Paul Levy and Public Citizen…but you have to wonder now if they’re doing it for their own sick entertainment, or if they really think they’re accomplishing anything.
People are still free to make up their own minds, and as Roger said the other day - did you believe Juanita Broaderick? Paula Jones? Neither one of them could prove it, either. And Mitch claimed that Paula Jones ‘got rich’ over what she did - when most of the settlement that was awarded her went toward paying attorneys fees. I doubt you could actually prove that she ‘got rich’ from it.
The attorneys are the ones who make out on all of this; nobody else ‘wins’.
Sinclair’s name will be forever tarnished by the retards that Public Citizen and google are protecting…
Since google has erased the names of those three, I think it’s appropriate to post some links to some blogs which published the information.
Mad Dog pointed to Hope’s Audacity and We Saw That. - for starters. I’ll try to update this with more when I’m able to circumvent google’s biased search engine in favor of Sinclair’s critics.
What I also find interesting about the google search is that the name of the firehouse gallery fellow is never connected with Larry Sinclair in a search for firehouse gallery and Sinclair, when he is one of the three.
You can easily find his name on wikipedia on an entry that he himself put up about firehouse gallery.
They’re all for self-promotion if it doesn’t connect them with the attacks on Sinclair.
But if they’re telling the truth, why the problem?
This information is a matter of the public record, and although they’re going to considerable lengths to keep it hidden, there are growing numbers of people who are aware of it - and how it’s being done in Obama’s name. The web sure seems to reflect the revisionism that Obama is becoming infamous for….
Vicious vindictiveness seems to be a signature since they don’t really care about ‘facts’ anymore…
And so much of this is following the same exact formula that was used against Jack Idema….right down to the strange Grand Jury thing.
Sadly, the families of Sgt. Alex Jimenez, 25, of Lawrence, Massachusetts, and Pvt. Byron Fouty, 19, of Waterford, Michigan, were notified that their loved ones’ bodies have been identified. Their remains were flown from Iraq to Dover Air Force Base in Delaware on Thursday. Both young men were part of the 10th Mountain Division out of Fort Drum, New York. Their patrol was ambushed by terrorists on May 12, 2007 in Yusufiya, Iraq; when they were kidnapped by terrorists along with Pfc. Joseph Anzack Jr, whose body was found previously.
