We don’t have one set of rules for Obamamaniacs and another for everyone else. There is one law; one set of rules, and if you break them, you break them. Period.

So what is this dichotomey we have between Larry Sinclair who brings up allegations about days in November 1999 and a sexual and drug encounter with Barack Obama, and Obama’s acolytes? Let’s review.

Sinclair comes out on youtube in January of 08 after having attempted to get through to Obama’s campaign since September of 07. After that there has been a virtual onslaught of attack on Sinclair, and Sinclair’s growing support base. Sinclair sounds like a lawyer when he’s questioning people such as Neon aka James Barry, who is hiding behind a psuedonym like the rest of the Obama lemming legions. What is different about their approach is - going to the trouble of hacking onto websites in order to find the email addresses of supporters, then posting that list in order to encourage people to go out on the web and dig up information on those people.

Sinclair brought on a DC court case in federal court against three of the bloggers who had been spreading malicious lies about him; and Public Citizen came to the rescue. Interesting, isn’t it, how Public Citizen is a Ralph Nader litigation group designed to protect citizens against corporations. Yet in this scenario, John Levy is representing three bloggers (who had already put their information out there on the web) and is protecting their identities from being revealed in court-from Larry Sinclair, a single dying gay man living in Minnesota.

They claim they have a right to anonymity, but again we have our two Americas. The attackers; the hackers; the malicious internet warriors have the right to THEIR anonymity, but those who are under attack by these malicious assailants need to stand still and take their punishment!

Larry Sinclair’s supporters have done nothing but position Sinclair so he is able to fight the battles that have cropped up in response to his bringing allegations of homosexual sex and drug use in the back of a limo in 1999 with Barack Obama to the public.

After not having heard from the Obama campaign, but receiving phone calls instead from Donald Young - Sinclair eventually came to the conclusion that Young had also been involved to some degree sexually with Obama. Gay people talk. And it’s been long known in gay circles that Obama is on the down low, that’s not a new revelation. What was new was in December of 2007, when Young sent Sinclair a text message, saying that he was only milking Sinclair for information, and that Obama never intended to admit to his drug use or anything else. And then Sinclair learned of Donald Young’s murder.

So it is little wonder that Sinclair came out in January of 2008. A lot had transpired between January 2008 and the months previous that magnified his desire to get this in front of the American people; particularly because Obama and Axelrod refused to even return a phone call.

It’s also not new that the media would go to great lengths to ignore this story, even now, as it develops into a freight train crashing down the tracks on its way to ripping away some of Obama’s god-like mystique as the lightgiver; allowing people to see him as he truly is.

“A light will shine down on you and you will suddenly realize…”

Turkeys! You’ve been had.

There is only a $1,000 reward for information leading to the apprehension of Donald Young’s killer. You might conclude from that that nobody is interested in finding out what happened there, despite the fact that he was shot execution style and died of multiple gunshot wounds. That $1,000 is in stark contrast to the lavish homes that both Wright and Obama live in, and the lifestyle to which they’ve become accustomed. You would think that Donald Young’s contribution to the church would have meant more than that. You would think that they would both be out there clamoring for an investigation, and for the killer to be brought to justice.

Although…maybe not. Maybe Obama is one of the leftists who’s been clamoring for lighter sentences for drug dealers and criminals of other stripes.

I think it’s great that Sinclair has a new site up. I think it’s great that he’s getting it ironclad so the Obamanazis can’t find a hole to steal information about commenters, etc. Rock on, Larry, and in the words of Citizen Wells: Stay safe.

Press Release
July 30, 2008

I am the organizer of the Stop the Memorial Blogburst, which is simultaneously posted by the evergrowing numbers of bloggers that participate every week.

Here are the bloggers who are participating as of this writing:

Over 90 different bloggers are posting our exposes on the Flight 93 Memorial every week. Google the title of any of our blogbursts and you will find 3 to 6 full pages of links.

(Actually 7 this week, but many of the links disappear from the listings over time.)

The blogbursts have been written mostly by Alec Rawls, the author of “Crescent of Betrayal“, and blogger at Error Theory. Each and every blogburst is not only thoroughly documented, they contain links to source documents, and many of our blogburst participants are inveterate fact-checkers who will follow the links and make sure that the information is sound.

Starting from the source documents, I have personally verified several of the most damning factual claims about the crescent design.

1. I verified that the giant crescent in the original Crescent of Embrace design points to Mecca. This is how I did it: I entered the latitude and longitude of the crash site into the Muslim prayer-direction calculator at qibla.com. Then, I printed out the resulting Mecca direction graphic, placed it over the site plan on my computer screen, and observed that the qibla line split the crescent almost exactly down the middle, with one crescent arm on each side.

2. I personally verified that a crescent that Muslims face into in order to face Mecca is called a mihrab, and is a key mosque feature. It’s easy to do that; Google the Prophet’s mihrab in Medina, or the mihrab of the Great Mosque in Cordoba Spain. These two famous mihrabs are both crescents that Muslims face into to face Mecca. Geometrically, the Crescent of Embrace is an equivalent structure.

3. I verified that there are 44 translucent memorial blocks along the flight path. I opened up the design drawings and counted them! The Sacred Ground design page shows 43 translucent marble blocks, built into the memorial walls that follow the flight path down to the point of impact. The Entry Portal design page shows another translucent panel at the upper tip, where the flight path symbolically “breaks the circle.” It is the huge glass panel that dedicates the entire site.

More facts that are easily verified can be found at the Proof of Betrayal page at www.CrescentOfBetrayal.com.

This design should be scrapped because it violates the single requirement that the park service had on this design; to leave the landscape untouched. There is a plan in place to DRAIN THE WETLANDS to accommodate this design. No other entry in the design competition did this.

The public law for the Flight 93 Memorial excludes the terrorists from the definition of passengers and crew; and are not to be honored.

These are just a few of the reasons why another design should be chosen to honor our heroes.

Cao

Cao’s blog
Http://caosblog.com

Looks pretty cool. Go say hi.

I read about this incident- the socialists at the protest in Chicago were saying some pretty incredible stuff…

Now you hear the other side.

From Jake and MJ.

Cheers to the mid-week trackback party, on HUMP DAY!

Trackback with one of your posts that you think deserves some special attention from this past week.

Watch for Open Trackbacks here on Fridays, Sundays and Wednesdays.

Here is the trackback link to this post:

http://caosblog.com/8288/trackback/

To trackback to any post just use the post slug or “permalink” and add trackback/ to the end of it.

One other thing.

I will be deleting trackbacks when the posts don’t show that you’ve linked here. Make sure you do as I did, below–either saying thanks to Cao’s blog and linking to this post, or mention that I have a trackback party, and link to this post. Otherwise the trackback will be deleted.

If you are unable to send trackbacks, then use the Wizbang Standalone Trackback Pinger.

Others holding trackback parties:

Add this Blogroll to your site